Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Bio- and chemocatalysis cascades as a bridge between biology and chemistry for green polymer synthesis

Cellular & Molecular Biology LettersAn International Journal201722:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-017-0061-1

Received: 4 September 2017

Accepted: 23 November 2017

Published: 4 December 2017

Abstract

The development and integration of bio- and chemocatalytic processes to convert renewable or biomass feedstocks into polymers is a vibrant field of research with enormous potential for environmental protection and the mitigation of global warming. Here, we review the biotechnological and chemical synthetic strategies for producing platform monomers from bio-based sources and transforming them into eco-polymers. We also discuss their advanced bio-application using the example of polylactide (PLA), the most valuable green polymer on the market.

Keywords

PolylactideLactic acidRing opening polymerization

This article was specially invited by the editors and represents work by leading researchers.

Introduction

Concerns about the effects of the chemical industry on global warming and fossil fuel shortages have led to a considerable increase in consumer demand for sustainable, “green” chemicals. A focus on developing commercially viable processes that convert bio-derived feedstocks into chemicals is one response to this [13]. Because the vast majority of commonly used polymers are derived from petrochemical resources and not readily degradable or recyclable, the polymer industry in particular is actively exploring and integrating new technologies. Biodegradable and/or renewable polymers are seen as one long-term solution for the environmentally damaging impact of petro-polymer and plastic pollution [46].

Significant progress has been made in the development and implementation of new processes and technologies to convert renewable feedstock into new green polymers. The aliphatic polyesters are a prominent group. They include polylactides (PLAs), which is the major synthetic green polymer on the market [7, 8].

PLAs are highly biocompatible due to their ability to be bioresorbed via the Krebs cycle and show benign performance in life-cycle assessments (LCA). PLAs have been used in the production of environmentally friendly packaging, disposable products, and advanced materials with biomedical applications. Their current industrial production level is 180·103 t with a forecast for 2020 of 1·106 t. This forecast might even be too conservative, considering that PLAs could replace PET in 20% of its current applications [9, 10].

Unfortunately, large-scale industrial production of PLAs via ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of lactide is inefficient, with high feedstock requirements and manufacturing costs [11, 12]. Current lactide monomer production is very costly. A novel synthetic strategy for lactide formation from lactic acid would need to be cheap and simple to positively impact large-scale production of PLA.

Since the synthesis of lactide monomers begins with anaerobic fermentation of renewable sugars to lactic acid, a new, cheaper production method using emerging chemical catalytic routes and/or concurrent biotechnological processes appears promising.

Unlike lactide, the five-membered γ-butyrolactone (γ-BL) is a biomass-derived cyclic ester that would be a valuable monomer for the synthesis of the newly developed biopolyester poly(γ-butyrolactone) (PγBL), which has unique properties desirable for synthetic biomaterials. Although γ-BL is accessible from biomass sources, its polymerization has proven difficult [13]. A cheap biotechnological process via lipase-catalyzed ROP of γ-BL yielded only a mixture of oligomers. Chemically, γ-BL has long been referred to as a non-polymerizable monomer because of its low strain energy [14, 15]. It should also be noted that γ-BL is a List I Chemical under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

PγBL has recently been synthesized as both a linear and a cyclic topology using ROP in the presence of metal complexes as initiators, but this is thus far only possible on a laboratory scale [16].

Another desirable feature of PγBL is the complete thermal recyclability from the polymer back to its cyclic monomer without the formation of its hydrolysis product, γ-hydroxybutyric acid, which is an FDA-regulated substance. This makes it the only example of a completely recyclable biopolymer. Thermal or catalytic degradation of PLAs produces many kinds of products, such as lactic acid and linear and cyclic oligomers, but never only the lactide monomer.

Biopolymers can also be produced directly from sugars or lipids via bacterial fermentation. The most recognized examples are polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). There is increasing interest worldwide to scale up the microbial production of PHAs. One of the most explored examples is the fermentation-based production of copolyesters from 3-hydroxybutyrate and 3-hydroxyvaleric acid [1726] A chemical catalytic process would be more effective, but efficient catalysts such as those used for ROP of lactides are unavailable, although exciting success has been achieved in laboratory-scale synthesis [2731].

While the US Department of Energy ranks lactic acid and γ-BL among the top 12 biomass-derived compounds best suited to replace petroleum-derived chemicals, bio-based chemical production is often limited by a lack of efficient conversion technology, especially when compared to the efficiency of processes conducted in the petrochemical industry [3239]. Considerable attention is given to the design and development of such bio-based technologies.

Our intention here is to present a perspective on the preparation of green polyesters using integrated bio- and chemocatalytic processes. We will summarize the state of knowledge on monomer synthesis and controlled polymerization and look at unique applications. In terms of processes, we will also present potential methodological bridges that could connect biology and chemistry for efficient and sustainable polymer synthesis.

Synthesis of renewable monomers

There are three major strategies to produce monomers or their precursors from natural resources. The most popular synthetic pathway is direct transformation of biomass into monomers via fermentation of carbohydrates. Another involves chemical degradation and transformation of natural polymers, exemplified by lignocellulosic biomass, which is the most abundant renewable polymer and which represents a sustainable feedstock. The last is based on a chemical transformation of organic compounds obtained directly from nature, such as vegetable oils, terpenes and resin acids.

Synthesis of lactide precursor

Lactic acid is the most recognized bio-based chemicals. It is one of the most relevant platform molecules for the synthesis of multiple commodities and intermediate downstream chemicals (e.g., acrylic acid, 1,2-propanediol, pyruvic acid, acetaldehyde, 2,3-pentanedione, lactate ester and propylene glycol) that are already part of the “traditional chemistry portfolio”. Importantly, lactic acid can also be polymerized into biodegradable plastics like PLA (Scheme  1 ) [4046].
Figure 1
Scheme 1

Chemical portfolio of lactic acid

Fermentation of carbohydrates

The dominant commercial production method for lactic acid is anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose or sucrose using organisms such as Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Other microorganisms and biomass sources are also possible [42, 44]. Bacterial fermentation is the preferred industrial process used by NatureWorks LLC and Corbion, the two major producers of PLA. The classic process requires strict temperature (< 313 K) and pH (5–7) and involves isolation of the product followed by purification through subsequent esterification, distillation and hydrolysis. The problem in this industrial bioprocess is the disposal of waste generated by the neutralization of the calcium lactate intermediate.

Alternative technologies based on desalting and electrodialysis and/or using engineered yeast species such as Pichia stipites to ferment xylose have been examined [42, 45]. This process offers the possibility to convert lignocellulosic sugars and perform the fermentation at lower pH. Commercial use of lignocellulosic biomass to produce lactic acid demands microorganisms that can use all the sugars derived from lignocellulosic biomass.

In general, advancing the biotechnology needed for lactic acid production requires: (i) optimization of the bioconversion of carbohydrates, (ii) bioprocesses with high rate and yield, (iii) pH and inhibitor tolerance, and (iv) engineering of organisms to produce high-quality product from the biomass sources in a single bioreactor. Moreover, the low productivity of such processes may be a great obstacle to the expansion of this technology to fulfill the future demand for lactic acid.

Cascade chemocatalysis

Non-fermentative catalytic chemical transformations for lactic acid production are simpler and more efficient than the biotechnological processes. Several studies have focused on the conversion of biomass resources, such as glucose, fructose, cellulose, and trioses like dihydroxyacetone (DHA), to lactic acid through catalyzed routes [4759] However, the yield of the lactic acid is far from satisfactory while using cellulose feedstock. The alternative chemical synthesis strategies are: (i) hydrothermal conversion of glycerol mediated by base catalysts [47, 53, 54]; (ii) conversion of cellulose feedstock or dihydroxyacetone catalyzed by Lewis acids [49, 55, 56]; (iii) conversion of glycerol by metal salts or metal complexes [52, 57, 58]; and (iv) conversion of glycerol in the presence of nanoparticle catalytic systems [59].

The alternative to biocatalytic synthesis of lactic acid is the novel cascade process containing bio- and chemocatalytic steps. It uses glycerol from biodiesel production as a raw material [51].

A synthetic strategy based on Lewis acid-catalyzed isomerization of 1,3-dihydroxyacetone (DHA) has been explored [4753]. Lanthanum, lead salts and iridium complexes have been used as active catalysts in the reaction [48, 52]. However, issues with the separation of lactic acid from the reaction mixture and the toxicity of the catalysts led to solid catalysts such as zeolites gaining more interest. The new hybrid bio−/chemocatalytic synthetic pathway is based on the enzymatic oxidation of glycerol to DHA followed by isomerization to lactic acid in water.

This process is particularly efficient in the presence of tin-containing MF1 zeolites, which are selective, recyclable and can be prepared by scalable methods (Fig. 1). Zeolite catalysts can also operate in concentrated aqueous or alcohol solutions, and it is possible to obtain two products, such as lactic acid or alkyl lactates. Additionally, the process contains the enzymatic production of dihydroxyacetone derived from crude glycerol, which is important from the point of view of the LCA.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Conventional and alternative lactid acid synthesis

Overall, cascade bio- and chemocatalytic production of lactic acid from glycerol seems ecologically and economically much more attractive than traditional biotechnological processes. It also appears to have a strong industrial implementation potential.

Recycling of polyactide

The recycling of polylactide to lactic acid via hydrolytic degradation has been also extensively studied [6071]. However, the most success has been achieved in catalytic alcoholysis of PLA waste to alkyl lactates. Although the concept of alkyl lactate synthesis from PLA is well established on a laboratory scale, the application in industry is limited.

There was a recent report of a new simple method of PLA recycling to alkyl lactates using alcoholysis under solvothermal conditions. The best catalytic activities were obtained in the presence of magnesium and calcium alkoxides, which acted as catalysts synthesized in situ from organometallic or metallic precursors and an alcohol [68].

Lactide synthesis

The conventional industrial process for converting lactic acid to lactide has two stages: (i) polycondensation of lactic acid to oligolactides, (ii) endothermic transesterification, which is facilitated in the presence of non-recoverable metal salts [6971].

The removal of lactide by distillation is necessary to avoid the thermodynamically favored reverse reaction. An additional complication in that two-step process is the inconvenient purification method. An ideal one-step synthesis should involve lactic acid dimerization to lactyl lactate followed by its direct cyclization to one exclusive desired product lactide.

A recent report focused on the novel direct zeolite-based catalytic process conversion of bio-based lactic acid to lactide (Fig. 2) [70]. The rationale for the use of zeolite catalysts is their ability to facilitate condensation reactions and the ideal recognition between molecular size and functionality differences between oligolactides and cyclic ester–lactides.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Lactide synthesis by classical and new routes in the presence of zeolite catalysts

This method’s synthesis of lactide is fast and directly selective with the use of microporous 12-membered ring H-zeolites under continuous water removal. The shape-selective properties of zeolites are essential to a high yield of lactide, and the method outperforms the classic multistep process and avoids both racemization and side-product formation. This versatile zeolite technology may facilitate the synthesis of a wide range of renewable, high-performing, degradable bio-based polymers.

Polymer synthesis

PLA is a versatile compostable polymer made from 100% renewable resources. The life cycle of PLA starts with renewable resources: a starch- or sugar-rich feedstock from the cheapest locally planted crops. Dextrose is converted to lactic acid via fermentation and a series of purification steps [11, 12]. The new and improved biotechnology proposes the conversion of cellulose or hemicellulose into fermentation sugars in a so-called biorefinery [12]. Lactic acid is transformed into lactide, which is then polymerized and processed into PLA pellets.

Optimally, the LCA should include all input and output aggregated in a series of categories extending from the production of raw materials to the final disposal of possible consumer products. A schematic of the LCA of PLA is shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

The LCA of PLA

ROP of bio-derived cyclic esters such as lactide is the best synthetic strategy to prepare aliphatic biopolyesters with desired and strictly planned properties (Fig. 1) [7276]. This is a widely used method to prepare well-defined biopolyesters with competitive applications. Some of the essential parameters to ensure living ROP are polymer microstructure, predictable chain length, dispersity (PDI) and planned chain ends. The control of those parameters is essential for the design of the physical, mechanical and degradation properties of the PLA.

Enzymatic ROP of lactide is possible but its success is limited in comparison to other chemical catalytic species. Thus far, the most advanced are the so-called single-site initiators based on metal complexes that reach very high levels of activity and stereocontrol of ROP processes [7276].

The general formula of active in ROP metal complexes is L-M-OR, where L is the ancillary ligand(s), M is metal center, and OR is the initiating group (Fig. 4). The aminophenol auxiliaries are currently the most popular [7798]. In the context of bio-applications, complexes including benign metals (Zn, Mg, Ca) are still the most desired [7798]. However, for those metals, the synthesis of heteroleptic complexes with a single-site motif is very difficult because they easily undergo ligand redistribution reactions [81, 84]. We recently proved that the precise synthesis of the desired L-M-OR/(L-M-OR)2 complexes with kinetically labile metals (Ca, Mg, Zn) relates to the molecular fitting of both ancillary (L) and initiating (OR) ligands. That is the guideline for rational structural motif design of new initiators for ROP reactions [7779, 9497].
Figure 4
Fig. 4

ROP of lactide (top), single-site initiators used in ROP of cyclic esters (bottom)

Another alternative is the binary catalytic system with the L2M/ROH combination. Some of these have a tendency to indicate selectivity towards polymerization or alcoholysis of lactides, which could lead to synthesis of alkyl esters or oligomers [97].

Polymer therapeutics

Polymer therapeutics encompass supramolecular drug-delivery systems and drug/protein–polymer conjugates. Although several polymer–protein and polymer–low molecular drug conjugates have received market approval, the search for new drug-delivery concepts and new courses of action is the major driving force in polymer therapeutics [99101].

Bio-applicable polymers should have advanced properties and functions but also comply with regulations on biocompatibility. There is a huge gap between the promising biopolymers reported in the literature and fully developed bio-applicable systems. The overall number of approved polymers matrices for human use is relatively low. Biodegradable aliphatic polyesters, like PLA, polyglycolide (PGA) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), are widely used in life sciences in a variety of bio-applications, including controlled drug release, gene therapy, regenerative medicine and implants [102, 103].

The copolymer PLGA is the most widely used material for drug release systems. Major problems encountered in controlled drug-delivery systems based on biodegradable PLGA matrices are the overall bioavailability of the released drugs and the rapid initial release from the polymer carriers. Therefore, there is still great interest in a new, effective and safe delivery system for the delivery of labile and/or large drug molecules to specific targets.

The controlled synthesis of PLA, PGA and PLGA is accomplished through metal-catalyzed/−initiated ROP of cyclic esters like lactide and glycolide [7298, 104, 105]. The molecular microstructure of synthetic polymers and copolymers is not as sophisticated and precisely designed as those typical for biopolymers. The most precise existing methodology for PLGA synthesis relies on the stepwise coupling of monomer units via an iterative method: an example of oligolactide synthesis is presented in Fig. 5 [106].
Figure 5
Fig. 5

The iterative method for oligolactide synthesis

This approach is valuable but has limitations. Each coupling step should be nearly quantitative, with protecting groups required to control the reactivity of the monomers; and time-consuming cycles involving coupling, washing and deprotection steps are needed for each monomer attachment.

Alternatively, catalytic living polymerization of precisely designed monomers could enable the synthesis of well-defined and complex macromolecular architectures. Nowadays, controlled living polymerizations, such as RAFT, ATRP, NMP and ROP, produce homopolymers with defined molecular weights and end groups, but incorporation of the new co-monomer in a fixed region of the polymer chain is difficult.

A segmer-assembly polymerization (SAP) approach was recently proposed. This procedure leads to the formation of periodic copolymers and allows access to a variety of PLGA sequences (Fig. 6) [107]. However, this method is less efficient than ROP.
Figure 6
Fig. 6

(Top) Ring-opening polymerization (ROP) used to prepare repeating sequence (ideal) or random (real) copolymer. (Bottom) Segmer-assembly polymerization (SAP) used to prepare sequence polymers. L – lactic unit, G – glycolic unit

A new concept based on ROP of cyclic esters is the design of simple drug delivery systems, obtained by the drug-initiated method, which allows for synthesis of well-defined pro-drugs. The method consists of growing short polymer chains and drugs bonded to the polymer as an end group [108110]. The resulting materials obtained in a well-controlled ROP process contain all polymer chains with a similar molar mass and the same end group, which is one drug molecule. The simple synthetic strategy means a potentially easy scale-up, which would be a crucial advantage compared to conventional drug-delivery systems. The strategy applies to hydroxyl-containing drugs, which are used as initiating groups during ROP. The examples are well-established anticancer drugs, such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, camptothecin, doxorubicin and goserelin, and immunosuppressive agents, such as cyclosporine A (Fig. 7).
Figure 7
Fig. 7

Drug-initiated methodology for the synthesis of polymer-drug conjugates

These polymer–drug conjugates can be obtained in a one-pot synthetic strategy and easily self-assembled into polymer nanoparticles, incorporated into lipid nanocarriers, or be applicable as polymer drugs. What’s more, these systems could be obtained by modular construction of polymer chains, with the copolymer backbone indicating new properties or functions.

Conclusions

Synthetic polymers are still chosen based on their physicochemical and structural properties. Controlled polymerization provides a promising platform to produce high-performance polymers with controlled molecular weights, functionalities and molecular architecture. Sustainable biopolymer production is complicated, with the main challenges being:
  • Monomer production from biomass sources

  • Accessibility of economic and ecological polymerization processes

  • Availability of suitable bio- and chemocatalysts for ROP

  • Availability of recycling technology to regenerate polymer waste to its cyclic monomer

In the nearest future, the bio- and chemocatalysis cascade will constitute the cornerstone of any strategy to realize the objectives for green technologies. Although many bio- and chemocatalytic systems can catalyze different transformations, performance improvements and their integration and transfer to larger-scale processes are still needed.

Ultimately, creating a sustainable renewable polymer industry should involve cooperative efforts between the chemicals industry, biomass conversion companies, and academic research groups. The aim should be to identify valuable novel conversion processes that can use the existing infrastructure to upgrade biomass monomers.

With continuous efforts to develop new biological and chemical technologies, and improved acceptance and understanding from the public, renewable polymers will play an increasing role in sustainable production and in the promotion of more environmentally benign materials.

Abbreviations

ATRP: 

Atom-transfer radical-polymerization

DHA: 

Dihydroxyacetone

FDA: 

Food & Drug Administration

LCA: 

Life-cycle assessment

NMP: 

Nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization

PDI: 

Polydispersion index

PET: 

Polyethylene terephthalate

PGA: 

Polyglycolide

PHA: 

Polyhydroxyalkanoate

PLA: 

Polylactide

PLGA: 

Poly (lactide-co-glycolide)

PγBL: 

Poly (γ-butyrolactone)

RAFT: 

Reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization

ROP: 

Ring-opening polymerization

SAP: 

Segmer-assembly polymerization

γ-BL: 

γ-butyrolactone

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

Jolanta Ejfler created the study concept and wrote and edited the manuscript. Aleksandra Marszałek-Harych and Dawid Jędrzkiewicz contributed to the writing, and prepared the figures and references. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland

References

  1. Corma A, Iborra S, Velty A. Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2411–502.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Vennestrøm PNR, Osmundsen CM, Christensen CH, Taarning E. Beyond petrochemicals: the renewable chemicals industry. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50(45):10502–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dapsens PY, Mondelli C, Perez-Ramirez J. Biobased chemicals from conception toward industrial reality: lessons learned and to be learned. ACS Catal. 2012;2:1487–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Law KL, Thompson RC. Oceans. Microplastics in the seas. Science. 2014;345:144–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gross RA, Kalra B. Biodegradable polymers for the environment. Science. 2002;297:803–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller SA. Sustainable polymers: opportunities for the next decade. ACS Macro Lett. 2013;2:550–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Auras R, Lim L-T, Selke SEM, Tsuji H. Poly (lactic acid): synthesis, structure, properties, processing and applications. New York: Wiley; 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Tuck CO, Perez E, Horvath IT, Sheldon RA, Poliakoff M. (2012) valorization of biomass: deriving more value from waste. Science. 2010;337:695–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. http://www.european-bioplastics.org/global-market-for-bioplastics-to-grow-by-20-percent/, Retrieved May, 2014.
  10. www.icis.com/resources/news/2012/04/30/9554300/big-potential for-bioplastics-packaging, Retrieved May, 2014.
  11. Vink ETH, Rabago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR. Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorksTM polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degradation Stability. 2003;80:403–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro-Aguirre E, Iniguez-Franco F, Samsudin H, Fang X, Auras R. Poly (lactic acid)-mass production, processing, industrial applications, and end of life. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:333–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Myers D, Cyriac A, Williams CK. Polymer synthesis: to react the impossible ring. Nat Chem. 2016;8:3–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Nobes GAR, Kozluska RJ, Marchessault RH. Lipase-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization of lactones: a novel route to poly (hydroxyalkanoate)s. Macromolecules. 1996;29:4829–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Houk KH, Jabbari A, Hall HK, Alemain C. Why δ-Valerolactone polymerizes and γ-Butyrolactone does not. J Org Chem. 2008;73:2674–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong M, Chen EY-X. Completely recyclable biopolymers with linear and cyclic topologies via ring-opening polymerization of γ-butyrolactone. Nat Chem. 2016;8:42–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen G-Q. A microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) based bio- and materials industry. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:2434–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Poirier Y. Green chemistry yields a better plastic. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:960–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen G-Q, Patel MK. Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2082–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Park SJ, Kim TW, Kim MK, Lee SY, Lim SC. Advanced bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates: towards a versatile and sustainable platform for unnatural tailor-made polyesters. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:1196–206.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang G, Hill DJ, Kowalczuk M, Johnston B, Adamus G, Irorere V, Radecka I. Carbon sources for Polyhydroxyalkanoates and an integrated biorefinery. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1157–78.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Radecka I, Irorere V, Jiang G, Hill DJ, Williams C, Adamus G, Kwiecień M, Marek AA, Zawadiak J, Johnston B, Kowalczuk M. Oxidized polyethylene wax as a potential carbon source for PHA production. Materials. 2016;9:367–83.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston B, Jiang G, Hill DJ, Adamus G, Kwiecień I, Zięba M, Sikorska W, Green M, Kowalczuk M, Radecka I. The molecular level characterization of biodegradable polymers originated from polyethylene using non-oxygenated PolyethyleneWax as a carbon source for Polyhydroxyalkanoate production. Bioengineering. 2017;4:74–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Muhra M, Rechberger EM, Salerno A, Reitrerer A, Schiller M, Kwiecień M, Adamus G, Kowalczuk M, Strohmeier K, Schober S, Mittelbach M, Koller M. Biodegradable latex form animal-derive waste. Biosynthesis and characterization of mer-PHA accumulated by Ps citronellolis. React Funct Polym. 2013;73:1391–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Scandola M, Focarete ML, Adamus G, Sikorska W, Baranowska I, Świerczek S, Gnatowski M, Kowalczuk M, Jedliński Z. Polymer blends of natural poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and a synthetic Atactic poly (3-hydroxybutyrate). Characterization Biodegradation Stud Macromolecules. 1997;30(9):2568–74.Google Scholar
  26. Bartczak B, Galeski A, Kowalczuk M, Sobota M, Malinowski R. Tough blends of poly (lactide) and amorphous poly ([R, S]-3-hydroxy butyrate) – morphology and properties. Eur Polym J. 2013;49:3630–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Klitzke JS, Roisnel T, Kirillov E, de L Casagrande O, Carpentier J-F. Yttrium− and aluminum−Bis (phenolate) pyridine complexes: catalysts and model compounds of the intermediates for the Stereoselective ring-opening polymerization of Racemic Lactide and β-Butyrolactone. Organometallics. 2014;33:309–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang L-J, Deng X-X, Du F-S, Li Z-C. Chemical synthesis of functional poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) with controlled degradation via Intramolecular Cyclization. Macromolecules. 2013;46:9554–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ebrahimi T, Aluthge DC, Hatzikiriakos SG, Mehrkhodavandi P. Highly active Chiral zinc catalysts for immortal polymerization of β-Butyrolactone form melt Processable Syndio-RichPoly(hydroxybutyrate). Macromolecules. 2016;49:8812–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jedlidski Z, Kowalczuk M, Główkowski W, Grobelny J. Novel polymerization of fl-Butyrolactone initiated by potassium Naphthalenide in the presence of a crown ether or a Cryptand. Macromolecules. 1991;24:349–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Adamus G, Kowalczuk M. Anionic ring-opening polymerization of β-Alkoxymethyl-substituted β-lactones. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(2):696–703.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bomgardner MM. Corporate ingenuity and determination is starting to pay off, but products must still be muscled into the supply chain. Chem Eng New. 2014;92:10–4.Google Scholar
  33. Bozell JJ, Petersen GR. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “top 10” revisited. Green Chem. 2010;12:539–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. William CK, Hillmyer MA. Polymers from renewable resources: a perspective for a special issue of polymer reviews. Polym Rev. 2008;48:1–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Coates GW, Hillmyer MA. A virtual issue of macromolecules: polymers from renewable resources. Macromolecules. 2009;42:7987–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Gandini A. Monomers and macromonomers from renewable resources. In Biocatalysis in polymer chemistry; Loos P. K ; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co: Weinheim. 2011;1−33, .Google Scholar
  37. Gallezot P. Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:1538–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Yao K, Tang C. Controlled polymerization of next-generation renewable monomers and beyond. Macromolecules. 2013;46:1689–712.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Gregory GL, Lopez-Vidal EM, Buchard A. Polymers from sugars: cyclic monomer synthesis, ring-opening polymerisation, material properties and applications. Chem Commun. 2017;53:2198–217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Hwang DW, Chang J-S, Upare PP, Lee U-H, Hwang YK. Method for producing lactide directly from lactic acid and a catalyst used therein. US Pat. 20160016151 A1, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Maki-Arvela P, Simakova IL, Salmi T, Murzin DY. Production of lactic acid/lactates from biomass and their catalytic transformations to commodities. Chem Rev. 2014;114:1909–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Datta R, Henry MJ. Lactic acid: recent advances in products, processes and technologies- a review. Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2006;81:1119–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Yoo DK, Kim D, Lee DS. Synthesis of lactide from oligomeric PLA: effect of temperature, preasure and catalyst. Macromol Res. 2006;14:510-6.Google Scholar
  44. John RP, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A. Fermentative production of lactic acid from biomass: an overview on process developments and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:524–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ilmen M, Koivuranta K, Ruohonen L, Suominen P, Penttila M. Efficient production of l-lactic acid from Xylose by Pichia stipitis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:117–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K. Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:877–902.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Rasrendra CB, Fachri BA, Makertihartha IGBN, Adisasmito S, Heeres HJ. Catalytic conversion of dihydroxyacetone to lactic acid using metal salts in water. Chem Sus Chem. 2011;4:768–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang F-F, Liu C-L, Dong W-S. Highly efficient production of lactic acid from cellulose using lanthanide triflate catalysts. Green Chem. 2013;15:2091–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang Y, Deng WW, Wang B, Zhang Q, Wan X, Tang Z, Wang Y, Zhu C, Cao Z, Wang G, Wan H. Chemical synthesis of lactic acid from cellulose catalysed by lead (II) ions in water. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sanchez C, Eguees I, Garcia A, Llano-Ponte R, Labidi J. Lactic acid production by alkaline hydrothermal treatment of corn cobs. Chem Eng J. 2012;181:655–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Morales M, Dapsens PY, Giovinazzo I, Witte J, Mondelli C, Papadokonstantakis S, Hungerbuhler K, Perez-Ramırez J. Environmental and economic assessment of lactic acid production from glycerol using cascade bio- and chemocatalysis. Energy Environ Sci. 2015;8:558–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lu Z, Demianets I, Hamze R, Terrile NJ, Williams TJ. A prolific catalyst for selective conversion of neat glycerol to lactic acid. ACS Catal. 2016;6:2014–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Kishida H, Jin F, Zhou Z, Moriya T, Enomoto H. Conversion of glycerine into lactic acid by alkaline hydrothermal reaction. Chem Lett. 2005;34:1560–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Shen Z, Jin F, Zhang Y, Wu B, Kishita A, Tohji K, Kishida H. Effect of alkaline catalysts on hydrothermal conversion of glycerin into lactic acid. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:8920–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Bicker M, Endres S, Ott L, Vogel H. Catalytical conversion of carbohydrates in subcritical water: a new chemical process for lactic acid production. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2005;239:151–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. De Clippel F, Dusselier M, Van Rompaey R, Vanelderen P, Dijkmans J, Makshina E, Giebeler L, Oswald S, Baron GV, Denayer JFM, Pescarmona PP, Jacobs PA, Sels BF. Fast and selective sugar conversion to alkyl lactate and lactic acid with bifunctional carbon-silica catalysts. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:10089–101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharninghausen LS, Campos J, Manas MG, Crabtree RH. Efficient selective and atom economic catalytic conversion of glycerol to lactic acid. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5084–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Pazhavelikkakath Purushothaman RK, van Haveren VJ, Van Es DS, Melián-Cabrera I, Meeldijk JD, Heeres H. An efficient one pot conversion of glycerol to lactic acid using bimetallic gold-platinum catalysts on a nanocrystalline CeO2 support. Appl Catal B. 2014;147:92–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Oberhauser W, Evangelisti C, Tiozzo C, Vizza F, Psaro R. Lactic acid from glycerol by ethylene-stabilized platinum-Nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 2016;6:1671–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Fan Y, Nishida H, Mori T, Shirai Y, Endo T. Thermal degradation of poly (L-lactide): effect of alkali earth metal oxides for selective L L-lactide formation. Polymer. 2004;45:1197–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Fan Y, Nishida H, Shirai Y, Tokiwa Y, Endo T. Thermal degradation behavior of poly(lactic acid) stereocomplex. Polym Degrad Stab. 2004;86:197–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Plichta A, Lisowska P, Kundys A, Zychewicz A, Dębowski M, Florjańczyk Z. Chemical recycling of poly (lactic acid) via controlled degradation with protic (macro) molecules. Polym Degrad Stab. 2014;108:288–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Nederberg F, Connor EF, Glausser T, Hedrick JL. Organocatalytic chain scission of poly(lactides): a general route to controlled molecular weight, functionality and macromolecular architecture. Chem Commun. 2001:2066–7.Google Scholar
  64. Song X, Wang H, Yang X, Liu F, Yu S, Liu S. Hydrolysis of poly (lactic acid) into calcium lactate using ionic liquid [Bmim]-[OAc] for chemical recycling. Polym Degrad Stab. 2014;110:65–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Piemonte V, Gironi F. Lactic acid production by hydrolysis of poly (L-lactic acid) in the solid state in aqueous solutions: an experimental and kinetic study. J Polym Environ. 2013;21:275–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Whitelaw EL, Davidson MG, Jones MD. Group 4 salalen complexes for the production and degradation of polylactide. Chem Commun. 2011;47:10004–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Fliedel C, Vila-Viçosa DMJ, Calhorda M, Dagorne S, Avilés T. Inside back cover: Dinuclear zinc–N-heterocyclic Carbene complexes for either the controlled ring-opening polymerization of Lactide or the controlled degradation of Polylactide under mild conditions. Chem Cat Chem. 2014;6:1357–67.Google Scholar
  68. Petrus R, Bykowski D, Sobota P. Solvothermal alcoholysis routes for recycling polylactide waste as lactic acid esters. ACS Catal. 2016;6:5222–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Dusselier M, Van Wouwe P, Dewaele A, Makshina E, Sels BF. Lactic acid as a platform chemical in the biobased economy: the role of chemocatalysis. Energy Environ Sci. 2013;6:1415–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Dusselier M, Van Wouwe P, Dewaele A, Jacobs PA, Sels BF. GREEN CHEMISTRY. Shape-selective zeolite catalysis for bioplastics production. Science. 2015;349:78–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Gruber PR, Hall ES, Kolstad JJ, Iwen ML, Benson RD, Borchardt RL. Continuous process for manufacture of lactide polymers with controlled optical purity. US pat. 5142023, 1992. Cargill Inc. Google Scholar
  72. O’Keefe BJ, Hillmyer MA, Tolman WB. Polymerization of Lactide and related cyclic esters by discrete metal complexes. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans. 2001:2215–24.Google Scholar
  73. Wu J, Yu T-L, Chen CT, Lin C-C. Recent developments in main group metal complexes catalyzed/initiated polymerization of Lactides and related cyclic esters. Coord Chem Rev. 2006;250:602–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Platel RH, Hodgson LM, Williams CK. Biocompatible initiators for Lactide polymerization. Polym Rev. 2008;48:11–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Wheaton CA, Hayes PG, Irealand BJ. Complexes of mg, ca and Zn as homogeneous catalysts for Lactide polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2009;25:4832–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Stanford MJ, Dove AP. Stereocontrolled ring-opening polymerisation of Lactide. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;39:486–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Ejfler J, Kobyłka M, Jerzykiewicz LB, Sobota P. Highly efficient magnesium initiators for Lactide polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2005:2047–50.Google Scholar
  78. Ejfler J, Krauzy-Dziedzic K, Szafert S, Jerzykiewicz LB, Sobota P. Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic studies of (Aryloxido) magnesium complexes. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2010:3602–9.Google Scholar
  79. Ejfler J, Szafert S, Mierzwicki K, Jerzykiewicz LB, Sobota P. Homo- and Heteroleptic zinc Aminophenolates as initiators for Lactide polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2008;46:6556–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams CK, Breyfogle LE, Choi SK, Nam W, Young VG Jr, Hillmyer MA, Tolman WB. A highly active zinc catalyst for the controlled polymerization of Lactide. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:11350–135.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Groysman S, Sergeeva E, Goldberg I, Kol M. Zinc complexes of amine mono (phenolate) [NOO2] Ligands: controlling coordination modes by bulk of Phenolate Substituents. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2006;14:2739–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Chen HY, Tang HY, Lin C. Ring-opening polymerization of Lactides initiated by zinc Alkoxides derived from NNO-tridentate Ligands. Macromolecules. 2006;39:3745–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Zheng Z, Zhao G, Fablet R, Bouyahyi M, Thomas CM, Roisnel T, Casagrande O Jr, Carpentier J-F. Zinc and Enolato-magnesium complexes based on bi-, tri- and Tetradentate Aminophenolate Ligands. New J Chem. 2008;32:2279–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu J, Chen YZ, Hung WC, Lin CC. Preparation, characterization, and catalytic studies of magnesium Phenoxides: highly active initiators for ring-opening polymerization of L-Lactide. Organometallics. 2008;27:4970–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Labourdette G, Lee DJ, Patrick BO, Ezhova MB, Mehrkhodavandi P. Unusually stable Chiral ethyl zinc complexes: reactivity and polymerization of Lactide. Organometallics. 2009;28:1309–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Chuang H-J, Weng S-F, Chang C-C, Lin C-C, Chen H-Y. Synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of magnesium and zinc Aminophenoxide complexes: catalysts for ring-opening polymerization of L-Lactide. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:9601–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Poirier V, Roisnel T, Carpentier J-F, Sarazin Y. Zinc and magnesium complexes supported by bulky multidentate amino-ether Phenolate Ligands: potent pre-catalysts for the immortal ring-opening polymerisation of cyclic esters. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:523–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Ikpo N, Saunders LN, Walsh JL, Smith JMB, Dawe LN, Kerton FM. Zinc complexes of Piperazinyl-derived Aminephenolate Ligands: synthesis, characterization and ring–opening polymerization activity. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2011;35:5347–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Weil J, Mathers RT, Getzler YDYL. Lactide Cyclopolymerization by an Alumatrane-inspired catalyst. Macromolecules. 2012;45:1118–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Song S, Zhang X, Ma H, Yang Y. Zinc complexes supported by claw-type Aminophenolate Ligands: synthesis, characterization and catalysis in the ring-opening polymerization of Rac-Lactide. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:3266–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Yi W, Ma H. Magnesium and calcium complexes containing biphenyl-based tridentate Iminophenolate Ligands for ring-opening polymerization of rac-Lactide. Inorg Chem. 2013;52:11821–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang H, Ma H. Highly Diastereoselective synthesis of Chiral Aminophenolate zinc complexes and Isoselective polymerization of rac-Lactide. Chem Commun. 2013;49:8686–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Yi W, Ma H. Magnesium complexes containing biphenyl-based tridentate Imino-Phenolate Ligands for ring-opening polymerization of rac-Lactide and α-Methyltrimethylene carbonate. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:5200–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Wojtaszak J, Mierzwicki K, Szafert S, Gulia N, Ejfler J. Homoleptic Aminophenolates of Zn, mg and ca. Synthesis, structure, DFT studies and polymerization activity in ROP of Lactides. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:2424–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Jędrzkiewicz D, Ejfler J, Gulia N, John Ł, Szafert S. Designing ancillary Ligands for Heteroleptic/Homoleptic zinc complex formation: synthesis, structures and application in ROP of Lactides. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:13700–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Jędrzkiewicz D, Ejfler J, John Ł, Szafert S. Zebra reaction or the recipe for the synthesis of Heterodimeric zinc complexes. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:2829–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Jędrzykiewicz D, Czelusniak I, Wierzejewska M, Szafert S, Ejfler J. Well-controlled, zinc-catalyzed synthesis of low molecular weight oligolactides by ring opening reaction. J Mol Catal A Chemical. 2015;396:155–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Słomkowski S, Penczek S, Duda A. Polylactides – an overwiew. Polym Adv Technol. 2014;25:436–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Haag R, Kratz K. Polymer therapeutics: concepts and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:1198–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Chen X, Parelkar SS, Henchey E, Schneider S, Emrick T. PolyMPC–Doxorubicin Prodrugs. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23:1753–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Liu S, Maheshwari R, Kiick KL. Polymer-based therapeutics. Macromolecules. 2009;42:3–13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, Coco R, Le Breton A, Préat V. PLGA-based nanoparticles: an overview of biomedical applications. J Control Release. 2012;161:505–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC. Degradable controlled-release polymers and PolymericNanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev. 2016;116:2602–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Hartmann MH. High molecular weight polylactic acid polymers. In: Kaplan DL, editor. Biopolymers from renewable resources. Heidelberg/Berling: Springer; 1998. p. 367–411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Ajioka M, Enomoto K, Suzuki K, Yamaguchi A. The basic properties of poly(lactic acid) produced by the direct condensation polymerization of lactic acid. J Environ Polym Degr. 1995;3:225–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Binauld S, Damiron D, Connal LA, Hawker CJ, Drockenmuller E. Precise synthesis of molecularly defined Oligomers and polymers by orthogonal iterative divergent/convergent approaches. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2011;32:147–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Li J, Rothstein SN, Little SR, Edenborn HM, Meyer TY. The effect of monomer order on the hydrolysis of biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) repeating sequence copolymers. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:16352–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Pan J, Wu R, Dai X, Yin Y, Pan G, Meng M, Shi W, Yan Y. A hierarchical porous bowl-like PLA@MSNs-COOH composite for pHDominated long-term controlled release of doxorubicin and integrated Nanoparticle for potential second treatment. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(4):1131–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Yu Y, Chen C-K, Law W-C, Weinheimer E, Sengupta S, Prasad PN, Cheng C. Polylactide-graft-doxorubicin Nanoparticles with precisely controlled drug loading for pH-triggered drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:524–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Nicolas J. Drug-initiated synthesis of polymer Prodrugs: combining simplicity and efficacy in drug delivery. Chem Mater. 2016;28:1591–606.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement