Skip to main content

Beyond K48 and K63: non-canonical protein ubiquitination

Abstract

Protein ubiquitination has become one of the most extensively studied post-translational modifications. Originally discovered as a critical element in highly regulated proteolysis, ubiquitination is now regarded as essential for many other cellular processes. This results from the unique features of ubiquitin (Ub) and its ability to form various homo- and heterotypic linkage types involving one of the seven different lysine residues or the free amino group located at its N-terminus. While K48- and K63-linked chains are broadly covered in the literature, the other types of chains assembled through K6, K11, K27, K29, and K33 residues deserve equal attention in the light of the latest discoveries. Here, we provide a concise summary of recent advances in the field of these poorly understood Ub linkages and their possible roles in vivo.

Introduction

Protein ubiquitination (interchangeably called ubiquitylation) involves the covalent attachment of the 76-amino acid eukaryotic molecule ubiquitin (Ub) to substrate proteins. An enzymatic cascade of a Ub activating enzyme (E1), Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and Ub ligases (E3s) governs the process, which is now recognized as an essential post-translational protein modification (PTM) of eukaryotic cells [1]. Ubiquitination is initiated by E1, an enzyme requiring ATP for the activation of Ub, which forms a thioester bond between the C-terminal Gly carboxyl group of Ub and its active site Cys. Upon activation, Ub is transferred onto the Cys residue of the E2 enzyme and substrate specificity is provided by the final enzyme in the cascade, the RING (really interesting new gene) or HECT (homologous to the E6-AP C-terminus)-type E3 ligase. As a result, isopeptide linkages are formed between the C-terminal carboxyl group of a Ub moiety and an ε-NH2 group on a lysine on the protein substrate or a preceding Ub moiety. In fact, E2-E3 complexes can decorate substrates with either a single Ub or several single Ub moieties (mono-multi-ubiquitination), or short Ub chains (oligoubiquitination). Alternatively, modification of the N-terminus or one of the seven lysine residues (K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, and K63) of a Ub moiety already attached to the target protein leads to the elongation of Ub chains. Modification of the same or a different residue results in the formation of homogeneous or heterogeneous chains, respectively [2]. These multifaceted Ub chains—often referred to as the ‘ubiquitin code’—propagate specific cellular signals that we highlight in this brief review.

The ability of Ub to create different types of chains via its lysine residues represents one of the most powerful features of this protein. Each type of polyubiquitin chain has the potential to act as a distinct intracellular signal that must be specifically identified and decoded by proteins harboring Ub-binding domains (UBDs) to facilitate the diverse outcomes of ubiquitination within cells. The best-studied modification remains the canonical signal for degradation by the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) where ubiquitinated substrates are recognized, bound, and degraded by the 26S proteasome, a 2.5-MDa cytosolic protein complex found in eukaryotic cells. This subject has been extensively explored in the literature over the last years and adequately reviewed [3,4,5]. The signal for degradation is created between the C-terminal residue of one Ub moiety and K48 of the previously conjugated Ub moiety [6]. In the process of protein degradation, deubiquitinases (DUBs) mediate the detachment of Ub chains from the protein to recycle Ub monomers for the next round of ubiquitination. Beyond their recycling role, DUBs are now widely recognized to coordinate proteasomal processing steps and modulate substrate degradation, imposing a checkpoint for proteasomal processing (recently reviewed in [7]).

K63-linked ubiquitination is the second best-known type [8], and an excellent review regarding linear ubiquitination is also available [9]. Notably, the implication of the former in endocytosis and the innate immune response, and the latter in the regulation of NF-κB signaling clearly demonstrate the role of ubiquitination in non-proteolytic cellular processes. This is in agreement with recent advances in the field of Ub biology indicating that protein degradation can no longer be regarded as the only possible outcome of ubiquitination. Currently, modification of substrate activities, modulation of protein localization or interactions, DNA damage repair, signal transduction, endocytosis, transcriptional regulation, and cell-cycle progression, have all been demonstrated as outcomes of ubiquitination [1]. In order to fulfill such diverse roles within cells, target proteins are modified by different types of Ub chains, which can now be more readily analyzed with the advent of powerful methods [10]. Unfortunately, understanding of atypical Ub linkages is still rather limited. Here, we briefly review the body of related work that is available on their roles.

Lysine 6—autophagy and the DNA damage response

Much of the early work centered around the study of K6-linked ubiquitination in mitophagy, the autophagic processing of damaged mitochondria [11,12,13,14]. Depolarization of mitochondria, a symptom of their dysfunction, results in the embedment of PINK1 (PTEN-induced kinase (1) into the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) [15] where it phosphorylates Ub moieties attached to OMM proteins [12], as well as Parkin E3 ligase [16]. Once activated, Parkin decorates damaged OMM proteins with K6, K11, K48 and K63-linked chains [12] designating mitochondria for mitophagy [17]. This process is mainly promoted by K6 and K63-linked chains [11] but can be counteracted by Ub-specific protease USP8 that removes K6-linked chains from Parkin and prevents its autoubiquitination [13, 18]. Another DUB, USP30, the only one that is anchored into the OMM [19], also antagonizes Parkin-mediated ubiquitination and shows a clear preference for deubiquitination of K6-linked polyUb chains, even though it is able to remove other types of Ub linkages as well [14]. It has been suggested that USP30 regulates mitophagy by controlling the ubiquitination of many OMM proteins, including TOM20 [19]. As defective mitophagy is linked to Parkinson’s disease, USP30-specific inhibitors are suggested to be potentially beneficial for patients by regulating the balance between mitochondrial ubiquitination and deubiquitination in neurodegenerative disorders [20].

The DNA damage response (DDR) has been repeatedly shown to be controlled by K6-linked ubiquitination [21,22,23,24,25]. Pioneering studies reported K6-linked auto-ubiquitination of BRCA1-BARD1, a major DDR complex [21], and demonstrated the formation of K6-linked chains during replication stress and double-strand break repair [22, 26]. A much more recent line of evidence for DDR leading to this atypical ubiquitination stems from the research on HUWE1, an E3 ligase that generates the majority of cellular K6-linked species upon inhibition of the valosin-containing protein (VCP/p97/Cdc48) [24, 27]. VCP seems to mediate the disposal of proteins specifically targeted by HUWE1 [28], and HUWE1-generated K6-linked chains can pose a proteasomal degradation signal as shown for Mfn2 (mitochondrial fusogenic protein 2) [27]. Similarly to Parkin, HUWE1 and two other human E3 ligases, RNF144A (RING finger protein 144) and RNF144B, can assemble K6-, K11-, K48-, K63-linked chains in vitro [27]. A deeper understanding of this linkage combination is still required to elucidate its possible roles in the cellular context.

Further support implicating K6-linked Ub chains in protein degradation has been provided by the work on Viperin. This potent antiviral effector is targeted by virus-induced acetyltransferase HAT1 and UBE4A Ub ligase [29]. K197 of Viperin is first acetylated by the former enzyme to enable binding of UBE4A, which in turn stimulates ubiquitination with K6-linked chains at K206 and Viperin’s degradation [29]. Therefore, the antiviral immune response is substantially controlled by UBE4A because of its ability to regulate both virus- and IFN-induced Viperin protein production. It is worth noting that UBE4A is a mammalian homolog of yeast Ufd2 (see below), both belonging to a newly-discovered group of E3/E4 ligases which are thought to recognize and extend already assembled Ub species irrespective of their conjugates [30].

Contrary to their degradative roles, accumulated evidence indicates that K6-linked chains can be involved in protein stabilization [31,32,33] and other non-degradative processes [34, 35], highlighting the functional multiplexity of this atypical ubiquitination. The most recent and perhaps the most intriguing function of K6-linked polyubiquitination is as a DNA-binding enhancer during the innate immune system response [36]. Upon viral infection, the transcription factor IRF3 (interferon regulatory factor 3) is modified with K6-linked conjugates by an unknown E3 ligase. This enhances antiviral innate immunity, as only K6-linked ubiquitinated IRF3 can interact with the promoter of genes encoding type I interferons (IFN). Their transcription is negatively controlled by OTUD1, as upon OTUD1-mediated deubiquitination of IRF3 this transcription factor dissociates from target genome DNA [36]. Nevertheless, the mechanism of action governing the regulatory function of K6-linked ubiquitination on IRF3 is not yet understood.

Lysine 11—not just another degradation signal

Despite the fact that K11-linked chains play a role in DDR [37], this atypical ubiquitination is generally associated with regulation of the cell cycle and proteasomal degradation. APC/C (Anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome) is a multi-subunit E3 RING ligase orchestrating mitosis and meiosis [38] and attaching K11/K48 mixed chains to substrates destined for proteasomal turnover [39, 40]. As a common motif with many other E3s, different E2s dictate the formation of various Ub chains [41, 42]. In the case of APC/C, its cooperation with UBE2C/UbcH10 and UBE2D/UbcH5 leads to the build-up of K48-linked chains, whereas UBE2S/APC/C interaction generates six to seven moieties-long K11-linked branch-offs [40, 42, 43]. Further studies demonstrated that UBE2S and APC/C are the major contributors to the K11-linked polyUb synthesis during mitosis [44]. Cells depleted of UbcH10 and UBE2S show impaired APC/C activity, leading to the stabilization of all APC/C substrates tested [45].

K11-linked chains are often accompanied by their K48 counterparts. Either of these homotypic conjugates can initiate protein degradation on their own [46], but their mutual incorporation, combined with chain branching, strongly enhances recognition by proteasomal receptor subunits in yeast [40, 47]. This may be in part ascribed to a conformation attained by the branched trimer, in which a novel hydrophobic interface between the distal Ub is found [47]. In humans, K11/K48-branched chains assembled by UBR4 and UBR5 provide proteasome-dependent quality control of mitotic regulators, misfolded nascent polypeptides and pathological Huntingtin variants [48,49,50]. In Drosophila, the Ci family of transcription factors involved in Hedgehog signaling is modified with K11/K48-linked chains to control their activation and repression. Interestingly, this type of control can be achieved by either complete or partial degradation, but for a long time it was unclear how proteasomes designate ubiquitinated proteins for the specific type of degradation. Some light was shed with the discovery that Ter94, a homolog of CDC48/p97/VCP, and K11-linked ubiquitination regulate partial degradation in Drosophila [51]. This finding is particularly important since the Hedgehog family of proteins plays an evolutionarily conserved role during the development of metazoans, and disruption of Hedgehog signaling results in developmental disorders and cancers.

Qin et al. [52] succeeded in demonstrating that K11-linked ubiquitination can both prevent and promote the induction of type I IFN. This is achieved temporally as a result of a striking competition between K11- and K48-linked polyubiquitination of STING at K150. RNF26, an E3 ligase catalyzing the former type of ubiquitination in ER and mitochondria, protects STING from RNF5-mediated K48-linked polyubiquitination and its proteasomal degradation, leading to increased type I IFN and cytokine production [53]. At the same time, RNF26 limits excessive type I IFN production by induction of autophagic degradation of IRF3 [52], highlighting the cross-talk between autophagy and antiviral innate immunity.

In summary, APC/C- and other E3-mediated K11-linked ubiquitination of recently identified substrates, including NOXA [54], β‐TrCP1 [55], SOX [56], and Ci [57], earmark them for degradation. On the other hand, these chains can also modulate protein–protein interactions [58] or provide protein stabilization, as shown for β‐Catenin [59, 60]. Currently, it remains unclear whether these opposite effects arise from the action of different E3 ligases, different Ub-binding proteins acting as Ub receptors, or both. Nevertheless, UBE2S is the common denominator in all cases and remains the only E2 capable of promoting the K11-linked chain extension identified to date [37, 61].

Analogously to E3s, some USPs are engaged in the interplay between autophagy and immune responses. By removing K11-linked chains at K437 from Beclin-1, an essential factor of autophagic initiation, USP19 induces autophagy and inhibits the production of type I IFN [62]. Others reported modulation of the innate immune responses via K11-linked ubiquitination. There is ample evidence supporting the involvement of K11-linked ubiquitination in the control of the degradation of mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) after RNA virus infection [63] and degradation of cGAS once Zika virus NS1 protein recruits USP8 to remove K11-linked chains from caspase-1 [64]. USP8 has also been shown to preferentially remove K11-linked chains preventing the autophagic degradation of SQSTM1/p62 (sequestosome 1), a critical autophagy receptor that promotes the formation and degradation of ubiquitinated aggregates [65].

A number of studies have also shown a clear cleavage specificity for K11-linkages by the DUB named Cezanne [66,67,68,69]. This specificity provides post-translational as well as transcriptional control of cellular levels of hypoxia-inducible factors HIF1α and HIF2α. The former is stabilized by countering its K11 polyubiquitination, thus preventing its degradation through chaperone-mediated autophagy [70]; the latter, interestingly, is not directly targeted by Cezanne. Instead, Cezanne regulates the expression of HIF2α by controlling levels of its transcription factor, E2F1 [71]. Since the abundance of HIF-1α and HIF-2α proteins increases in many cancers, the control of their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation may be of clinical importance. Such control could be achieved through the inhibition of specific DUBs. Indeed, DUBs have recently drawn much attention as therapeutic targets, as many are differentially expressed or activated in tumors. Nevertheless, the clinical development of selective DUB inhibitors faces multiple obstacles, with DUB specificity for Ub chains being one of them.

K11-linked conjugates represent the most abundant of the non-canonical Ub chain species in yeast [72, 73] and plants [74]. Early studies identified yeast Ubc6, an E2 involved in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation, as a K11-linked modified proteolytic substrate [73]. In plants, E2s play multiple roles in DNA repair, cellular responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, growth and development, as well as plant immunity. Interestingly, one of the E2s, UBC22, is more closely related to human UBE2S than to other E2s from Arabidopsis thaliana and mediates K11-linked ubiquitination [75]. Recently, UBC22 has been suggested to play a major role in many cellular processes [76], probably through its interactions with different E3s. Given that the number of E2s is roughly the same in human and Arabidopsis genomes (~ 40) [77] but E3s are about two and a half times more abundant in plants (~ 600 in the human genome but over 1,400 in A. thaliana [77]), one can assume that the UBC22-mediated K11-linked conjugation may be a much more common platform of the Ub landscape in plants than in humans.

Lysine 27—a major player of innate immunity

Ubiquitination is a part of every step of viral infection [78] and K27-linked chains are heavily implicated in the regulation of NF-κB and IRF pathways. IRF3 serves both as a transcription factor for type I IFN production in the early phases of viral infection and a pro-apoptotic factor in the late phase of viral infection [79,80,81,82]. In zebrafish, both IRF3 and IRF7 can be decorated with K27-linked Ub chains to promote their proteasomal degradation [83]. Negative regulation of IRF3 has also been shown to be present in human cell lines. In this case, this regulation results from IRF3 autophagic degradation in a CALCOCO2/NDP52-dependent manner [84] that can be counteracted by PSMD14, a DUB which removes K27-linked chains from IRF3 and prevents its recognition by CALCOCO2 [84]. Thus, by promoting stabilization of IRF3, PSMD14 regulates type I IFN signaling and selective autophagy.

In the case of TBK1, at least three different modes of action are associated with K27-linked chains. Apart from the fact that they provide recruitment sites for TBK1 upon ubiquitination of STING, they also facilitate activation of TBK1 as a result of the migration of the K27-modified STING-TBK1 complex from ER membrane to perinuclear microsomes [85]. The STING-dependent signaling pathway is also positively regulated by RNF185, which enhances the enzymatic activity of cGAS through its K27-linked catalyzed polyubiquitination [86]. K27-linked chains are removed from STING by two DUBs, USP13 and USP21, inhibiting TBK1-dependent signal transduction and acting as negative regulators of the innate immune response [87, 88].

During dengue virus infection, NS3, one of the viral nonstructural proteins, interacts with NS2B to create the NS2B3 protease complex, which cleaves the viral polyprotein and some of the ER-localized proteins involved in the antiviral response, such as STING. It has been suggested that K27-linked ubiquitination of NS3 enhances protein–protein interactions and facilitates the formation of the NS2B3 complex [89]. However, this is a rather unexpected finding since this non-canonical ubiquitination has been previously shown to inhibit viral replication by promoting the proteasomal degradation of viral proteins from classical swine fever and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses [90, 91]. Further experiments will be required to shed more light on K27-linked ubiquitination of viral proteins.

Proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), are widely known to activate TGFβ-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), which plays a significant role in the subsequent activation of NFκB signaling. To fine-tune its function, TAK1 undergoes multiple PTMs, including ubiquitination. While the role of K63- and K48-linked ubiquitination is widely discussed (reviewed in [92]), the scaffolding role of K27-linked ubiquitination has only recently been recognized in the case of TAK1. Once Ub chains are removed by USP19, the interaction between TAK1 and its partners TAB2 and TAB3 is abolished to downregulate TNFα- and IL-1β-induced NFκB activation [93]. Apart from its canonical role as an activator of NF-κB signaling, TNFα induces and sustains activation of MEK/ERK oncogenic signaling [94], where BRAF, a member of the RAF family protein kinases, is one of the key players [95]. Upon activation by inflammatory cytokines, the ITCH HECT-type E3 ligase ubiquitinates BRAF with K27-linked chains to provide sustained BRAF activation and to promote proliferation and invasion of melanoma cells [96]. Thus, one can imagine that ITCH could be targeted with therapeutic agents to prevent tumorigenesis, especially since ITCH has also been identified as an E3 targeting TIEG1 for K27-linked ubiquitination [97].

NEDD4 (neuronal precursor cell expressed, developmentally downregulated 4) and HACE1 (HECT domain and ankyrin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin ligase 1) are two E3 ligases known to promote K27-linked ubiquitination. The former E3 ligase is found to provide defense against bacterial infections through the stabilization of Beclin-1 with K6- and K27-linked ubiquitination [98]. The latter enzyme decorates optineurin, an autophagic receptor engaged in the disposal of damaged mitochondria [99], with K48- and K27-linked chains. The former type of Ub linkages leads to protein degradation, while the latter provides an interaction site between optineurin and SQSTM1 [100]. In all these cases, K27-linked ubiquitination is responsible for propelling autophagy progression. However, HACE1 can also ubiquitinate YB-1, a conserved DNA and RNA interacting factor whose function varies depending on its nuclear or cytoplasmic localization. Strikingly, K27-linked ubiquitination is required for secretion of YB-1 [101], but its extracellular functions are unknown.

The TRIM (Tripartite motif) family of E3 ligases carries out numerous tasks in the RLR-activated immune defense mechanism by assembling K27-linked chains and mediating protein–protein interactions. For instance, auto-ubiquitination of TRIM23 is required for its localization to autophagosomal membranes [102]. On the other hand, auto-ubiquitination of TRIM26 attracts NEMO and leads to type I IFN and cytokine production, as well as the expression of interferon-stimulated genes [103]. NEMO can itself become a target of K27-linked chains’ ubiquitination by TRIM23 [104]. In this case, Ub chains serve as a scaffold where the Rhbdd3 protease binds and recruits the DUB A20 via K27-linked chains attached to Rhbdd3. Once recruited, A20 deubiquitinates K63-linked polyUb chains on NEMO, suppressing TLR-triggered NF-κB activation in dendritic cells [105]. Another report also supports the role of K27-linked ubiquitination in controlling NF-κB as Hectd3 promotes K27- and K29-linked polyubiquitination on Malt1, and K27-linked polyubiquitination on Stat3, leading to NF-κB activation [106].

Extensive studies have shown that K27-linked ubiquitination negatively regulates cellular components involved in the immune response against RNA viruses. TRIM40 promotes the K27- and K48-linked polyubiquitination of MDA5 and RIG-I, leading to their degradation in the proteasome. This role in inhibiting IRF3 and activation of NF-kB has been suggested to prevent the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases [107]. MAVS, which is recruited by MDA5 and RIG-I after sensing viral RNA, is ubiquitinated and designated for degradation. In human cells, this is accomplished by K27-linked chains on MAVS at K7 which serve as a recognition signal for autophagic degradation [108]. Conversely, K27-linked polyubiquitination of MAVS at K325 has been reported as a positive regulation signal for the innate immune response [109]. The above discrepancy may be explained by ubiquitination of different lysine residues and/or by implication of different E3 ligases: MARCH8 in the former case and TRIM21 in the latter case. However, further studies are required to elucidate the observed phenomena.

Similarly to K6 and K63-linked chains, K27 conjugates are also assembled onto H2A histones and provide binding platforms for DNA repair proteins such as 53BP1 [37, 110, 111]. A RING-type E3, RNF168, is responsible for assembling K27-linked polyUb-H2A conjugates [111]. It is postulated that K27 polyubiquitination is the major ubiquitination interlink induced by DNA damage [111]. On the other hand, the study above did not reveal significant participation of this kind of polymer during DDR [23]. Such a discrepancy might be ascribed to a different damaging agent used, etoposide in the former case [111] and ionizing radiation in the latter [23].

In addition to its role in antimicrobial and antiviral immunity, K27-linked ubiquitination has also been reported to play a role in anti-fungal signaling where TRIM62 activates CARD9 through its K27-linked ubiquitination [112]. It has also been observed that the joint presence of K27 and K29-linked chains promotes proteasomal and autophagic degradation, as well as protein aggregation associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD, see below) [113,114,115].

Lysine 29—signaling and neurodegenerative disorders

As mentioned earlier, K29-linked ubiquitination of proteins has been implicated in neurodegenerative disorders. In the case of PD, TRAF6 promotes the aggregation of mutant DJ-1 and α-synuclein through K29-, but also K6-, and K27-linked chains [116]. In the pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease, the accumulation and aggregation of insoluble Ub-containing mHTT (the mutant huntingtin protein) have also been observed. These aggregates contain several E3 ligases, such as TRAF6, which has been found in the postmortem brains of Huntington’s disease patients and is decorated with K29-linked chains [117]. The sequestration of E3 ligases decreases the availability of active enzymes in the cell and abolishes their enzymatic activities, which may be important for recruiting their substrates into the aggregates. Remarkably, protein aggregation may constitute a protective mechanism against toxic proteins. Overexpression of the WSB1 E3 ligase counteracts LRRK2 neuronal toxicity [115], a common cause of PD. Neuronal protection of primary neurons is attributed to WSB1-catalyzed ubiquitination of LRRK2 with mixed K27/K29-linked chains, which stimulates aggregation presumably when K48-mediated proteasomal degradation of aberrant protein is no longer possible [115]. All in all, this effect justifies targeting WSB1 in the treatment of PD [118]. Taken together, these novel findings support the notion that atypical ubiquitination can exert opposite and regulatory effects in neurodegenerative disorders.

K29-linked chains have been reported to downregulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling [119, 120]. Smurf1-catalyzed ubiquitination of Axin with K29-linked chains blocks its interaction with the Wnt receptors and enables β-catenin disposal, stalling the Wnt pathway [120]. Smurf1 represses protein–protein interaction during autophagosome maturation, where it decorates UVRAG, a complex obligatory for this process, with K29 and K33-linked chains [121]. This leads to increased autophagic flux as modified UVRAG becomes unable to bind its inhibitor, Rubicon [122]. In contrast, UPS-mediated disposal of ULK1 modified with K27 and K29-linked Ub chains abolishes autophagic progression [114]. In this regard, K29-linked ubiquitination could be seen as the mechanism that controls autophagy during cellular stress.

The SKP1-Cullin-Fbx21 E3 ligase complex catalyzes K29-linked ubiquitination of Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) [123]. This leads to the production of IFN β and interleukin 6, but details of this virus-induced activation of ASK1 signaling remain obscure. Another antiviral innate immune response involves K27- and K29-linked induced removal of MAVS aggregates by RNF34 [113]. Interestingly, only K27-linked modifications are obligatory for the autophagic intake in this case [113]. The same study also showed that RNF34 is an upregulator of mitophagy, leaving the question whether the removal of MAVS results from mitophagy or autophagy [113].

An interesting interplay is observed between Ufd2p and Ufd4, E2s found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The former catalyzes K48-linked multi-monoubiquitination of a substrate as long as the substrate carries K29-linked chains formed beforehand by the latter [124]. Even though this indicates that K29-linkage is a non-degradable signal that must be transformed into a proteasome-favored type, e.g., K48-linked chains, lysosomal degradation of DTX has been ascribed to the K29-linked ubiquitination mediated by ITCH/AIP4 [125].

Intriguingly, K29-linked ubiquitination can switch off malfunctioning proteasomes as shown in proteasome-inhibition proteomics studies [61]. During proteasomal stress, UBE3C catalyzes the assembly of K29-linked chains onto the Rpn13 proteasomal receptor [126]. A proteasome modified in such a manner loses its ability to bind ubiquitinated proteins [126].

Ubiquitination with K29/K33‐linked mixed chains has been shown to control AMP-activated protein kinases. While many of these enzymes remain largely uncharacterized, these kinases are considered to be involved in controlling whole-body energy homeostasis. Two members of this family, ARK5/NUAK1 and MARK4, exhibit K29/K33-linked polyubiquitination in vivo [127]. Importantly, the attachment of K29/K33‐coupled chains has been shown to interfere specifically with phosphorylation of the activation‐loop residues, thus blocking their kinase activity [127].

Lysine 33—still much to learn

To date, K33-linked ubiquitination remains the least studied of all Ub linkage types. The first significant breakthrough came upon structural analysis of TRABID and its K29/K33-linkage specificity [128, 129]. However, there are still only very limited reports providing an in-depth explanation of the role of K33-linked ubiquitination in physiological processes. In some cases, this ubiquitination is identified but the functional consequences have not been explored [130]. This makes this type of linkage even more enigmatic, although there is a general consensus that K33-linked chains are likely non-degradative because this type of ubiquitination is not significantly enriched upon proteasomal inhibition [34].

One of the first reports came from the observation of increased T cell activation rates accompanied by spontaneous autoimmunity due to abnormal T cell receptor (TCR)-ζ chain phosphorylation in double knock-out mice cells lacking the Cbl-b and Itch E3 ligases [131]. This phosphorylation could be prevented by K33-linked ubiquitination at K54 of TCR. Therefore, the Ub-mediated regulation of TCR-ζ is not via degradation, but rather by modulation of interactions with its kinase, Zap70 [131].

The observed negative regulation of the innate immune responses via K33-linked ubiquitination may be explained by three possible mechanisms. One involves protein stabilization that has been reported in the case of TBK1 upon viral infection. That is to say, the removal of K33-linked chains from TBK1 by USP38 enables subsequent K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [132]. The other explanation arises from the fact that ubiquitination of the DNA-binding domain of STAT1, a type I interferon-induced transcription factor, inhibits STAT1 association with promoters of at least four interferon-stimulated genes and suppresses type I IFN-activated antiviral defense [133]. Lastly, the virus-induced translocation of IRF3 to the nucleus is impeded by K33-linked polyubiquitination within the IRF3 nuclear localization signal motif. More specifically, K33-linked ubiquitination disturbs protein–protein interactions between IRF3 and importin receptors [134] rather than its DNA-binding capabilities, thus preventing the translocation of IRF3 to the nucleus and expression of IFNβ1 upon viral stimulation.

It has also been shown that K33-linked ubiquitination plays a significant role in protein trafficking. Coronin7 is a protein responsible for F-actin binding and stabilization during the synthesis of tubular-carrier precursors on the trans-Golgi network (TGN). KLHL20-mediated non-degradable K33-linked ubiquitination of Coronin7 promotes its interaction with Eps15, a UBD-containing clathrin adaptor required for post-Golgi trafficking. The subsequent recruitment of Coronin7 to TGN induces the biogenesis of TGN-derived transport carriers [135]. Therefore, K33- is the latest addition to the Ub linkages, mainly K63-, which may serve as protein sorting signals.

Emerging in vivo imaging methods revealed the co-localization of K33-linked polyUb chains and Ub-binding autophagy adaptors, such as LC3B and its interacting partner SQSTM1 [136]. Indeed, SQSTM1 was later shown to be decorated with K29- and K33-linked chains in antibacterial autophagy [137]. The most recent findings connect LZTR1-mediated K33-linked ubiquitination of RAS-GTPases and autophagy via their interactions with SQSTM1 [138]. Notably, LZTR1 had been previously implicated in autophagy through its colocalization with LC3B [139]. In conclusion, these discoveries strongly interlink K33 ubiquitination and autophagy, although the precise role of this atypical ubiquitination remains elusive.

Summary and future outlook

The deciphering of the Ub code has continued to advance significantly in recent years.. The latest biochemical and Ub-enrichment methods, as well as mass spectrometry-based approaches, enabled us to study the variety of Ub chains and their unique properties at an unprecedented level (Table 1). This rapid development is often driven by the studies of dysfunction of Ub signaling pathways as they offer hope for targeted therapies in cancer [140] and neurodegenerative disorders [141,142,143].

Table 1 Overview of non-K48/K63-linked ubiquitination

A number of questions regarding ubiquitination remain to be addressed, including the possibility of non-protein ubiquitination [144] or the co-existence of many Ub combinations in a cell at any given time. In the latter case, it has already been shown that the N-terminus of proteins, cysteine, serine, and threonine residues can all serve as sites for ubiquitination [145]. In addition, other PTMs, such as acetylation, deamidation, phosphorylation, or ADP-ribosylation of Ub, have also been reported, adding yet another layer of Ub complexity [146]. Overall, studying the Ub code, proteins and enzymes involved in (de)ubiquitination pathways offers the possibility for the insightful understanding of the majority of cellular processes.

Abbreviations

APC/C:

Anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome

DDR:

DNA damage response

DUB:

Deubiquitinase

HACE1:

HECT domain and ankyrin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin ligase 1

HECT:

Homologous to the E6-AP C-terminus

HIF:

Hypoxia-inducible factor

HUWE1:

HECT, UBA and WWE domain-containing protein 1

IFN:

Interferon

IRF3:

Interferon regulatory factor 3

MARCH:

Membrane-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase containing RING-CH-type zinc finger motifs

MAVS:

Mitochondrial antiviral signaling

NEDD4:

Neuronal precursor cell expressed, developmentally downregulated 4

NEMO:

NF-kappaB essential modulator

OMM:

Outer mitochondrial membrane

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

PINK1:

PTEN-induced kinase 1

PPI:

Protein–protein interactions

PTM:

Post-translational modification

RING:

Really interesting new gene

RLR:

RIG-I-like receptor

RNF:

RING finger protein

STING:

Stimulator of interferon genes

TBK1:

TANK-binding kinase 1

TCR:

T cell receptor

TLR:

Toll-like receptor

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor α

TRIM:

Tripartite motif-containing protein

Ub:

Ubiquitin

UBD:

Ubiquitin-binding domain

UBR:

Ubiquitin ligase E3 component N-recognin

UPS:

Ubiquitin/proteasome system

USP:

Ubiquitin-specific proteases

References

  1. 1.

    Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Haakonsen DL, Rape M. Branching out: improved signaling by heterotypic ubiquitin chains. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29(9):704–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pohl C, Dikic I. Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Science. 2019;366(6467):818–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chino H, Mizushima N. ER-Phagy: quality control and turnover of endoplasmic reticulum. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30(5):384–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Song J, Herrmann JM, Becker T. Quality control of the mitochondrial proteome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00300-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chau V, Tobias JW, Bachmair A, Marriotr D, Ecker DJ, Gonda DK, et al. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science. 1982;1989(243):1576–83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shin JY, Muniyappan S, Tran NN, Park H, Lee SB, Lee BH. Deubiquitination reactions on the proteasome for proteasome versatility. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Komander D, Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81(1):203–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dittmar G, Winklhofer KF. Linear ubiquitin chains: cellular functions and strategies for detection and quantification. Front Chem. 2020;7:915.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhao B, Tsai YC, Jin B, Wang B, Wang Y, Zhou H, et al. Protein engineering in the ubiquitin system: tools for discovery and beyond. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72(2):380–413.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ordureau A, Heo J, Duda DM, Paulo JA, Olszewski JL, Yanishevski D. Defining roles of PARKIN and ubiquitin phosphorylation by PINK1 in mitochondrial quality control using a ubiquitin replacement strategy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(21):6637–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ordureau A, Sarraf SA, Duda DM, Heo J, Jedrychowski MP, Sviderskiy VO, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveal a feedforward mechanism for mitochondrial PARKIN translocation and ubiquitin chain synthesis. Mol Cell. 2014;56(3):360–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Durcan TM, Tang MY, Pérusse JR, Dashti EA, Aguileta MA, Mclelland L, et al. USP8 regulates mitophagy by removing K6 -linked ubiquitin conjugates from parkin. EMBO J. 2014;33(21):2473–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cunningham CN, Baughman JM, Phu L, Tea JS, Yu C, Coons M, et al. USP30 and parkin homeostatically regulate atypical ubiquitin chains on mitochondria. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(2):160–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Narendra DP, Jin SM, Tanaka A, Suen D, Gautier CA, Shen J, et al. PINK1 is selectively stabilized on impaired mitochondria to activate parkin. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(1):e1000298.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kazlauskaite A, Kondapalli C, Gourlay R, Campbell DG, Ritorto MS, Hofmann K, et al. Parkin is activated by PINK1-dependent phosphorylation of ubiquitin at Ser65. Biochem J. 2014;460(1):127–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Heo J, Ordureau A, Paulo JA, Rinehart J, Harper JW, Haven N. The PINK1-PARKIN mitochondrial ubiquitylation pathway drives a program of TBK1 activation and recruitment of OPTN and NDP52 to promote mitophagy. Mol Cell. 2015;60(1):7–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Durcan TM, Fon EA. USP8 and PARK2/parkin-mediated mitophagy. Autophagy. 2015;11(2):428–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gersch M, Gladkova C, Schubert AF, Michel MA, Komander D, Maslen S, et al. Mechanism and regulation of the Lys6-selective deubiquitinase USP30. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24(11):920–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bingol B, Tea JS, Phu L, Reichelt M, Bakalarski CE, Song Q, et al. The mitochondrial deubiquitinase USP30 opposes parkin-mediated mitophagy. Nature. 2014;510(7505):370–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wu-baer F, Lagrazon K, Yuan W, Baer R. The BRCA1/BARD1 heterodimer assembles polyubiquitin chains through an unconventional linkage involving lysine residue K6 of ubiquitin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(37):34743–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Morris JR, Solomon E. BRCA1: BARD1 induces the formation of conjugated ubiquitin structures, dependent on K6 of ubiquitin, in cells during DNA replication and repair. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(8):807–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Elia AEHH, Boardman AP, Wang DC, Huttlin EL, Everley RA, Dephoure N, et al. Quantitative proteomic atlas of ubiquitination and acetylation in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell. 2015;59(5):867–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Heidelberger JB, Voigt A, Borisova ME, Petrosino G, Ruf S, Wagner A, et al. Proteomic profiling of VCP substrates links VCP to K6-linked ubiquitylation and c-Myc function. EMBO Rep. 2018;19(4):e44754.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cassidy KB, Bang S, Kurokawa M, Gerber SA. Direct regulation of Chk1 protein stability by E3 ubiquitin ligase HUWE1. FEBS J. 2020;287(10):1985–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lu CS, Truong LN, Aslanian A, Shi LZ, Li Y, Hwang PYH, et al. The RING finger protein RNF8 ubiquitinates Nbs1 to promote DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(52):43984–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Michel MA, Swatek KN, Komander D, Michel MA, Swatek KN, Hospenthal MK, et al. Ubiquitin linkage-specific affimers reveal insights resource ubiquitin linkage-specific affimers reveal insights into K6-linked ubiquitin signaling. Mol Cell. 2017;68(1):233-46.e5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xu Y, Anderson DE, Ye Y. The HECT domain ubiquitin ligase HUWE1 targets unassembled soluble proteins for degradation. Cell Discov. 2016;2(1):16040.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yuan Y, Miao Y, Qian L, Zhang Y, Liu C, Liu J, et al. Targeting UBE4A revives viperin protein in epithelium to enhance host antiviral defense. Mol Cell. 2020;77(4):734-47.e7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Baranes-Bachar K, Levy-Barda A, Oehler J, Reid DA, Soria-Bretones I, Voss TC, et al. The ubiquitin E3/E4 ligase UBE4A adjusts protein ubiquitylation and accumulation at sites of DNA damage, facilitating double-strand break repair. Mol Cell. 2018;69(5):866-78.e7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Srivastava D, Chakrabarti O. Mahogunin-mediated α-tubulin ubiquitination via noncanonical K6 linkage regulates microtubule stability and mitotic spindle orientation. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(2):e1064.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mukherjee R, Majumder P, Chakrabarti O. MGRN1-mediated ubiquitination of α-tubulin regulates microtubule dynamics and intracellular transport. Traffic. 2017;18(12):791–807.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hong SY, Kao YR, Lee TC, Wu CW. Upregulation of E3 ubiquitin ligase CBLC enhances EGFR dysregulation and signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78(17):4984–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kim W, Bennett EJ, Huttlin EL, Guo A, Li J, Possemato A, et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin modified proteome. Mol Cell. 2011;44(2):325–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Wagner SA, Beli P, Weinert BT, Nielsen ML, Mann M, Choudhary C. A proteome-wide, quantitative survey of in vivo ubiquitylation sites reveals widespread regulatory roles. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(10):111.013284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang Z, Wang D, Wang P, Zhao Y, You F. OTUD1 negatively regulates type i IFN induction by disrupting noncanonical ubiquitination of IRF3. J Immunol. 2020;204(7):1904–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Paul A, Wang B. RNF8- and Ube2S-dependent ubiquitin lysine 11-linkage modification in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2017;66(4):458-72.e5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang J, Wan L, Dai X, Sun Y, Wei W. Functional characterization of Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) E3 ubiquitin ligases in tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1845(2):277–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Grice GL, von Heijne G, Lobb IT, Michael P, Gygi SP, Antrobus R, et al. The proteasome distinguishes between heterotypic and homotypic lysine-11-linked polyubiquitin chains. Cell Rep. 2015;12(4):545–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Meyer H-J, Rape M. Enhanced protein degradation by branched ubiquitin chains. Cell. 2014;157(4):910–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Plechanovová A, Jaffray E, Tatham MH, Naismith JH. Structure of a RING E3 ligase and ubiquitin-loaded E2 primed for catalysis. Nature. 2012;489(7414):115–20.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wickliffe KE, Lorenz S, Wemmer DE, Kuriyan J, Rape M. The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2. Cell. 2011;144(5):769–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wu T, Merbl Y, Huo Y, Gallop JL, Tzur A, Kirschner MW. UBE2S drives elongation of K11-linked ubiquitin chains by the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(4):1355–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Matsumoto ML, Wickliffe KE, Dong KC, Yu C, Bosanac I, Bustos D, et al. K11-linked polyubiquitination in cell cycle control revealed by a K11 linkage-specific antibody. Mol Cell. 2010;39(3):477–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Williamson A, Wickliffe KE, Mellone BG, Song L, Karpen GH, Rape M. Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(43):18213–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Oh E, Akopian D, Rape M. Principles of ubiquitin-dependent signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2018;34:137–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Boughton AJ, Krueger S, Fushman D, Boughton AJ, Krueger S, Fushman D. Branching via K11 and K48 bestows ubiquitin chains with a unique interdomain interface and enhanced affinity for proteasomal subunit Rpn1. Structure. 2020;28(1):29-43.e6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hong JH, Kaustov L, Coyaud E, Srikumar T, Wan J, Arrowsmith C, et al. KCMF1 (potassium channel modulatory factor 1) links RAD6 to UBR4 (ubiquitin N-recognin domain-containing E3 ligase 4) and lysosome- mediated degradation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14(3):674–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Subbaiah V, Zhang Y, Israel B, Medical D, Rajagopalan D, Yeo N. E3 ligase EDD1/UBR5 is utilized by the HPV E6 oncogene to destabilize tumor suppressor TIP60. Oncogene. 2016;35(16):2062–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yau RG, Doerner K, Castellanos ER, Haakonsen DL, Wang N, Yang XW, et al. Assembly and function of heterotypic ubiquitin chains in cell cycle and protein quality control. Cell. 2017;171(4):918–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Zhang Z, Lv X, Yin WC, Zhang X, Feng J, Wu W, et al. Ter94 atpase complex targets k11-linked ubiquitinated ci to proteasomes for partial degradation. Dev Cell. 2013;25(6):636–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Qin Y, Zhou MT, Hu MM, Hu YH, Zhang J, Guo L, et al. rnf26 temporally regulates virus-triggered type I interferon induction by two distinct mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(9):e1004358.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhong B, Zhang L, Lei C, Li Y, Mao AP, Yang Y, et al. The ubiquitin ligase RNF5 regulates antiviral responses by mediating degradation of the adaptor protein MITA. Immunity. 2009;30(3):397–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zhou W, Xu J, Li H, Xu M, Chen ZJ, Wei W, et al. Neddylation E2 UBE2F promotes the survival of lung cancer cells by activating CRL5 to degrade NOXA via the K11 linkage. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(4):1104–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kuang P, Tan M, Zhou W, Zhang Q, Sun Y. SAG/RBX2 E3 ligase complexes with UBCH10 and UBE2S E2s to ubiquitylate β-TrCP1 via K11-linkage for degradation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37441.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wang J, Zhang Y, Hou J, Qian X, Zhang H, Zhang Z, et al. Ube2s regulates Sox2 stability and mouse ES cell maintenance. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(3):393–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Pan C, Xiong Y, Lv X, Xia Y, Zhang S, Chen H, et al. UbcD1 regulates Hedgehog signaling by directly modulating Ci ubiquitination and processing. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(11):1922–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Dynek JN, Goncharov T, Dueber EC, Fedorova AV, Izrael-Tomasevic A, Phu L, et al. C-IAP1 and UbcH5 promote K11-linked polyubiquitination of RIP1 in TNF signalling. EMBO J. 2010;29(24):4198–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hay-Koren A, Caspi M, Zilberberg A, Rosin-Arbesfeld R. The EDD E3 ubiquitin ligase ubiquitinates and up-regulates β-catenin. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(3):399–411.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Li Z, Wang Y, Li Y, Yin W, Mo L, Qian X, et al. Ube2s stabilizes β-Catenin through K11-linked polyubiquitination to promote mesendoderm specification and colorectal cancer development article. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(5):456.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Swatek KN, Komander D. Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 2016;26(4):399–422.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Jin S, Tian S, Chen Y, Zhang C, Xie W, Xia X, et al. USP 19 modulates autophagy and antiviral immune responses by deubiquitinating Beclin-1. EMBO J. 2016;35(8):866–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Xing J, Zhang A, Minze LJ, Li XC, Zhang Z. TRIM29 negatively regulates the type I IFN production in response to RNA virus. J Immunol. 2018;201(1):183–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zheng Y, Liu Q, Wu Y, Ma L, Zhang Z, Liu T, et al. Zika virus elicits inflammation to evade antiviral response by cleaving cGAS via NS 1-caspase-1 axis. EMBO J. 2018;37(18):1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Peng H, Yang F, Hu Q, Sun J, Peng C, Zhao Y, et al. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP8 directly deubiquitinates SQSTM1/p62 to suppress its autophagic activity. Autophagy. 2020;16(4):698–708.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Bremm A, Freund SMV, Komander D. Lys11-linked ubiquitin chains adopt compact conformations and are preferentially hydrolyzed by the deubiquitinase Cezanne. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(8):939–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Mevissen TET, Hospenthal MK, Geurink PP, Elliott PR, Akutsu M, Arnaudo N, et al. OTU deubiquitinases reveal mechanisms of linkage specificity and enable ubiquitin chain restriction analysis. Cell. 2013;154(1):169–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mevissen TET, Kulathu Y, Mulder MPC, Geurink PP, Maslen SL, Gersch M, et al. Molecular basis of Lys11-polyubiquitin specificity in the deubiquitinase Cezanne. Nature. 2016;538(7625):402–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bonacci T, Suzuki A, Grant GD, Stanley N, Cook JG, Brown NG, et al. Cezanne/ OTUD 7B is a cell cycle-regulated deubiquitinase that antagonizes the degradation of APC/C substrates. EMBO J. 2018;37(16):1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bremm A, Moniz S, Mader J, Rocha S, Komander D. Cezanne (OTUD7B) regulates HIF-1α homeostasis in a proteasome-independent manner. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(12):1268–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Moniz S, Bandarra D, Biddlestone J, Campbell KJ, Komander D, Bremm A, et al. Cezanne regulates E2F1-dependent HIF2α expression. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(15):3082–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Cheng D, Marsischky G, et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(8):921–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT, Cheng D, Xie Y, Robert J, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell. 2009;137(1):133–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Zhu X, Yu F, Yang Z, Liu S, Dai C, Lu X, et al. In planta chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry analysis of protein structure and interaction in Arabidopsis. Proteomics. 2016;16(13):1915–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Wang S, Cao L, Wang H. Arabidopsis ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC22 is required for female gametophyte development and likely involved in Lys11-linked ubiquitination. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(11):3277–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wang S, Li Q, Zhao L, Fu S, Qin L, Wei Y, et al. Arabidopsis UBC22, an E2 able to catalyze lysine-11 specific ubiquitin linkage formation, has multiple functions in plant growth and immunity. Plant Sci. 2020;297:110520.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Liu W, Tang X, Qi X, Fu X, Ghimire S, Ma R, et al. The ubiquitin conjugating enzyme: an important ubiquitin transfer platform in ubiquitin-proteasome system. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2894.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Gu H, Fada BJ. Specificity in ubiquitination triggered by virus infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zeng W, Xu M, Liu S, Sun L, Chen ZJ. Key role of Ubc5 and lysine-63 polyubiquitination in viral activation of IRF3. Mol Cell. 2009;36(2):315–25.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Yu Y, Hayward GS. The ubiquitin E3 ligase RAUL negatively regulates type I interferon through ubiquitination of the transcription factors IRF7 and IRF3. Immunity. 2010;33(6):863–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Zhao X, Zhu H, Yu J, Li H, Ge J, Chen W. c-Cbl-mediated ubiquitination of IRF3 negatively regulates IFN-β production and cellular antiviral response. Cell Signal. 2016;28(11):1683–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Chattopadhyay S, Kuzmanovic T, Zhang Y, Wetzel JL, Sen GC. Ubiquitination of the transcription factor IRF-3 activates RIPA, the apoptotic pathway that protects mice from viral pathogenesis. Immunity. 2016;44(5):1151–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Li Z, Fan S, Wang J, Chen X, Liao Q. Zebrafish F-box protein fbxo3 negatively regulates antiviral response through promoting K27-linked polyubiquitination of the transcription factors irf3 and irf7. J Immunol. 2020;205(7):1897–908.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Wu Y, Jin S, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Ma L, Zhao Z, et al. Selective autophagy controls the stability of transcription factor IRF3 to balance type I interferon production and immune suppression. Autophagy. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1761653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Wang Q, Liu X, Cui Y, Tang Y, Chen W, Li S, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase AMFR and INSIG1 bridge the activation of TBK1 kinase by modifying the adaptor STING. Immunity. 2014;41(6):919–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Wang Q, Huang L, Hong Z, Lv Z, Mao Z, Tang Y, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF185 facilitates the cGAS-mediated innate immune response. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(3):1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Sun H, Zhang Q, Jing Y, Zhang M, Wang H, Cai Z, et al. USP13 negatively regulates antiviral responses by deubiquitinating STING. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15534.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Chen Y, Wang L, Jin J, Luan Y, Chen C, Li Y, et al. p38 inhibition provides anti-DNA virus immunity by regulation of USP21 phosphorylation and STING activation. J Exp Med. 2017;214(4):991–1010.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Liu H, Zhang L, Sun J, Chen W, Li S, Wang Q, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum protein SCAP inhibits Dengue virus NS2B3 protease by suppressing its K27-Linked polyubiquitylation. J Virol. 2017;91(9):e02234-e2316.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zheng G-L, Yang Q, Yu S, Wang J, et al. Porcine RING finger protein 114 inhibits classical swine fever virus replication via K27-linked polyubiquitination of viral NS4B. J Virol. 2019;93(21):e01248-e1319.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Bai Y, Li L, Shan T, Zhang Y, Chen X, Gao F, et al. Proteasomal degradation of nonstructural protein 12 by RNF114 suppresses porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication. Vet Microbiol. 2020;246:108746.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Hirata Y, Takahashi M, Morishita T, Noguchi T, Matsuzawa A. Post-translational modifications of the TAK1-TAB complex. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(1):1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Lei C-Q, Wu X, Zhong X, Jiang L, Zhong B, Shu H-B. USP19 Inhibits TNF-α– and IL-1β–triggered NF-κB activation by deubiquitinating TAK1. J Immunol. 2019;203(1):259–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Shao Y, Le K, Cheng H, Aplin AE. NF-κB regulation of c-FLIP promotes TNFα-mediated RAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(7):1839–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Wellbrock C, Karasarides M, Marais R. The RAF proteins take centre stage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5(11):875–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Yin Q, Han T, Fang B, Zhang G, Zhang C, Roberts ER, et al. K27-linked ubiquitination of BRAF by ITCH engages cytokine response to maintain MEK-ERK signaling. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1870.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Peng D-J, Zeng M, Muromoto R, Matsuda T, Shimoda K, Subramaniam M, et al. Noncanonical K27-linked polyubiquitination of TIEG1 regulates Foxp3 expression and tumor growth. J Immunol. 2011;186(10):5638–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Pei G, Buijze H, Liu H, Moura-Alves P, Goosmann C, Brinkmann V, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase NEDD4 enhances killing of membrane-perturbing intracellular bacteria by promoting autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13(12):2041–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Wong YC, Holzbaur ELF. Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(42):E4439–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Liu Z, Chen P, Gao H, Gu Y, Yang J, Peng H. Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor Optineurin by HACE1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(1):106–20.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Palicharla VR, Maddika S. HACE1 mediated K27 ubiquitin linkage leads to YB-1 protein secretion. Cell Signal. 2015;27(12):2355–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Sparrer KMJJ, Gableske S, Zurenski MA, Zachary M, Full F, Baumgart GJ, et al. TRIM23 mediates virus-induced autophagy via activation of TBK1. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2(11):1543–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Ran Y, Zhang J, Liu LL, Pan ZY, Nie Y, Zhang HY, et al. Autoubiquitination of TRIM26 links TBK1 to NEMO in RLR-mediated innate antiviral immune response. J Mol Cell Biol. 2016;8(1):31–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Arimoto K, Funami K, Saeki Y, Tanaka K, Okawa K, Takeuchi O, et al. Polyubiquitin conjugation to NEMO by triparite motif protein 23 (TRIM23) is critical in antiviral defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(36):15856–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Liu J, Han C, Xie B, Wu Y, Liu S, Chen K, et al. Rhbdd3 controls autoimmunity by suppressing the production of IL-6 by dendritic cells via K27-linked ubiquitination of the regulator NEMO. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(7):612–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Cho JJ, Xu Z, Parthasarathy U, Drashansky TT, Helm EY, Zuniga AN, et al. Hectd3 promotes pathogenic Th17 lineage through Stat3 activation and Malt1 signaling in neuroinflammation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Zhao C, Jia M, Song H, Yu Z, Wang W, Li Q, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM40 attenuates antiviral immune responses by targeting MDA5 and RIG-I. Cell Rep. 2017;21(6):1613–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Jin S, Tian S, Luo M, Xie W, Liu T, Duan T, et al. Tetherin suppresses type I interferon signaling by targeting MAVS for NDP52-mediated selective autophagic degradation in human cells. Mol Cell. 2017;68(2):308-22.e4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Xue B, Li H, Guo M, Wang J, Xu Y, Zou X, et al. TRIM21 promotes innate immune response to RNA viral infection through Lys27-linked polyubiquitination of MAVS. J Virol. 2018;92(14):e00321-e418.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Doil C, Mailand N, Bekker-jensen S, Menard P, Larsen DH, Pepperkok R, et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell. 2009;136(3):435–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Gatti M, Pinato S, Aebersold R, Penengo L, Gatti M, Pinato S, et al. RNF168 promotes noncanonical K27 ubiquitination to signal DNA damage. Cell Rep. 2015;10(2):226–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Cao Z, Conway KL, Heath RJ, Rush JS, Leshchiner ES, Ramirez-Ortiz ZG, et al. Ubiquitin ligase TRIM62 regulates CARD9-mediated anti-fungal immunity and intestinal inflammation. Immunity. 2015;43(4):715–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    He X, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Geng Y, Gong J, Geng J, et al. RNF 34 functions in immunity and selective mitophagy by targeting MAVS for autophagic degradation. EMBO J. 2019;38(14):e100978.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Nazio F, Carinci M, Valacca C, Bielli P, Strappazzon F, Antonioli M, et al. Fine-tuning of ULK1 mRNA and protein levels is required for autophagy oscillation. J Cell Biol. 2016;215(6):841–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Nucifora FC Jr, Nucifora LG, Ng CH, Arbez N, Guo Y, Roby E, et al. Ubiqutination via K27 and K29 chains signals aggregation and neuronal protection of LRRK2 by WSB1. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11792.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Zucchelli S, Codrich M, Marcuzzi F, Pinto M, Vilotti S, Biagioli M, et al. TRAF6 promotes atypical ubiquitination of mutant DJ-1 and alpha-synuclein and is localized to Lewy bodies in sporadic Parkinson’s disease brains. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(19):3759–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Huang B, Baek SH. Trim13 potentiates toll-like receptor 2-mediated nuclear factor κB activation via K29-linked polyubiquitination of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6. Mol Pharmacol. 2017;91(4):307–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Schapira M, Calabrese MF, Bullock AN, Crews CM. Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(12):949–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Tauriello DVF, Maurice MM. The various roles of ubiquitin in Wnt pathway regulation. Cel Cycle. 2010;9(18):3700–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Fei C, Li Z, Li C, Chen Y, Chen Z, He X, et al. Smurf1-mediated Lys29-linked nonproteolytic polyubiquitination of axin negatively regulates Wnt/β-Catenin signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(20):4095–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Feng X, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Ma F, Zhu Y, Hong X, et al. Ubiquitination of UVRAG by SMURF1 promotes autophagosome maturation and inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth. Autophagy. 2019;15(7):1130–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Chen R, Chen Y, Huang T. Ubiquitin-mediated regulation of autophagy. J Biomed Sci. 2019;26(1):80.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Yu Z, Chen T, Li X, Yang M, Tang S, Zhu X, et al. Lys29-linkage of ASK1 by Skp1-Cullin 1-Fbxo21 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for antiviral innate response. Elife. 2016;5:e14087.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Liu C, Liu W, Ye Y, Li W. Ufd2p synthesizes branched ubiquitin chains to promote the degradation of substrates modified with atypical chains. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14274.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Chastagner P, Israël A, Brou C. Itch/AIP4 mediates Deltex degradation through the formation of K29-linked polyubiquitin chains. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(11):1147–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Besche HC, Sha Z, Kukushkin NV, Peth A, Hock E, Kim W, et al. Autoubiquitination of the 26S proteasome on rpn13 regulates breakdown of ubiquitin conjugates. EMBO J. 2014;33(10):1159–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Al-Hakim AK, Zagorska A, Chapman L, Deak M, Peggie M, Alessi DR. Control of AMPK-related kinases by USP9X and atypical Lys 29/Lys33-linked polyubiquitin chains. Biochem J. 2008;411(2):249–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Licchesi JDF, Mieszczanek J, Mevissen TET, Rutherford TJ. An Ankyrin-repeat ubiquitin binding domain determines TRABID’s specificity for atypical ubiquitin chains. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(1):62–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Michel MA, Elliott PR, Swatek KN, Simicek M, Pruneda JN, Wagstaff JL, et al. Assembly and specific recognition of K29- and K33-linked polyubiquitin. Mol Cell. 2015;58(1):95–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Deng L, Jiang C, Chen L, Jin J, Wei J, Zhao L, et al. The ubiquitination of RagA GTPase by RNF152 negatively regulates mTORC1 activation. Mol Cell. 2015;58(5):804–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Huang H, Jeon M, Liao L, Yang C, Elly C, Yates JR, et al. K33-linked polyubiquitination of T cell receptor-ζ regulates T cell activation by modulating its endocytosis-independent phosphorylation. Immunity. 2010;33(1):60–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Lin M, Zhao Z, Yang Z, Qin Y, Wang R, Cui J, et al. USP38 inhibits type I interferon signaling by editing TBK1 ubiquitination through NLRP4 signalosome. Mol Cell. 2016;64(2):267–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Liu S, Jiang M, Wang W, Liu W, Song X, Ma Z, et al. Nuclear RNF2 inhibits interferon function by promoting K33-linked STAT1 disassociation from DNA. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(1):41–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Gao L, Wang L, Dai T, Jin K, Zhang Z, Wang S, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes antagonize innate antiviral immunity article. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(3):233–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Yuan W, Lee Y, Lin S, Chang L, Tan YP, Hung C, et al. K33-linked polyubiquitination of Coronin 7 by Cul3-KLHL20 ubiquitin E3 ligase regulates protein trafficking. Mol Cell. 2014;54(4):586–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Nibe Y, Oshima S, Kobayashi M, Maeyashiki C, Otsubo K, Matsuda H, et al. Novel polyubiquitin imaging system, PolyUb-FC, reveals that K33-linked polyubiquitin is recruited by SQSTM1/p62. Autophagy. 2018;14(2):347–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Heath RJ, Goel G, Baxt LA, Rush JS, Mohanan V, Paulus GLC, et al. RNF166 determines recruitment of adaptor proteins during antibacterial autophagy. Cell Rep. 2016;17(9):2183–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. 138

    Abe T, Umeki I, Kanno S, Inoue S, Niihori T, Aoki Y. LZTR1 facilitates polyubiquitination and degradation of RAS-GTPases. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(3):1023–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Bigenzahn JW, Collu GM, Kartnig F, Pieraks M, Vladimer GI, Heinz LX, et al. LZTR1 is a regulator of RAS ubiquitination and signaling. Science. 2018;362(6419):1171–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Zhang X, Linder S, Bazzaro M. Drug development targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) for the treatment of human cancers. Cancers. 2020;12(4):902.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Watanabe Y, Taguchi K, Tanaka M. Ubiquitin, autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases. Cells. 2020;9(9):2022.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Kumar D, Ambasta RK, Kumar P. Ubiquitin biology in neurodegenerative disorders: from impairment to therapeutic strategies. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;61:101078.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Lim KH, Joo JY, Baek KH. The potential roles of deubiquitinating enzymes in brain diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;61:101088.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Pao K-C, Wood NT, Knebel A, Rafie K, Stanley M, Mabbitt PD, et al. Activity-based E3 ligase profiling uncovers an E3 ligase with esterification activity. Nature. 2018;556(7701):381–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    McClellan AJ, Laugesen SH, Ellgaard L. Cellular functions and molecular mechanisms of non-lysine ubiquitination. Open Biol. 2019;9(9):190147.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Song L, Luo ZQ. Post-translational regulation of ubiquitin signaling. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(6):1776–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Altun M, Zhao B, Velasco K, Liu H, Hassink G, Paschke J, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 19 (USP19) regulates hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) during hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 2012;2879(3):1962–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is supported by grants from the National Science Centre of Poland (NCN No. 2015/19/D/NZ1/02790 to WB).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Bialek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tracz, M., Bialek, W. Beyond K48 and K63: non-canonical protein ubiquitination. Cell Mol Biol Lett 26, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-020-00245-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ubiquitin
  • Non-canonical
  • Atypical ubiquitination
  • Ubiquitin chains
\