Skip to main content
Download PDF

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell exosome-derived miR-874-3p targeting RIPK1/PGAM5 attenuates kidney tubular epithelial cell damage

Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters volume 28, Article number: 12 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Kidney insults due to various pathogenic factors, such as trauma, infection, and inflammation, can cause tubular epithelial cell injury and death, leading to acute kidney injury and the transformation of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease. There is no definitive treatment available. In previous studies, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to promote kidney injury. In this preclinical study, we investigate the role and mechanism of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell exosomes (HucMSC-Exos) on the repair of renal tubular epithelial cells after injury.

Methods

C57BL/6 mice underwent unilateral ureteral obstruction, and epithelial cell injury was induced in HK-2 cells by cisplatin. HucMSC-Exos were assessed in vivo and in vitro. The extent of renal cell injury, activation of necroptosis pathway, and mitochondrial quality-control-related factors were determined in different groups. We also analyzed the possible regulatory effector molecules in HucMSC-Exos by transcriptomics.

Results

HucMSC-Exo inhibited necroptosis after renal tubular epithelial cell injury and promoted the dephosphorylation of the S637 site of the Drp1 gene by reducing the expression of PGAM5. This subsequently inhibited mitochondrial fission and maintained mitochondrial functional homeostasis, mitigating renal injury and promoting repair. In addition, HucMSC-Exo displayed a regulatory role by targeting RIPK1 through miR-874-3p.

Conclusion

The collective findings of the present study demonstrate that HucMSC-Exos can regulate necroptosis through miR-874-3p to attenuate renal tubular epithelial cell injury and enhance repair, providing new therapeutic modalities and ideas for the treatment of AKI and the process of AKI to CKD transformation to mitigate renal damage.

Introduction

Owing to its unique microcirculatory characteristics and physiological functions, the kidney is one of the organs most vulnerable to ischemia, hypoxia, and toxic injury. Various external injuries, bacterial infections, and immune responses can frequently cause acute kidney injury (AKI). Patients with severe AKI have a poor prognosis. Most survivors gradually progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), requiring kidney transplantation or lifelong replacement therapy, which significantly reduces the quality of life and places a heavy burden on the patient’s family and society [1,2,3,4]. Renal fibrosis is a crucial link in the development of chronic transformation of various AKIs and CKDs and the most critical pathological basis for progression to ESRD [5]. In the pathological process of renal fibrosis, important links include tubular epithelial cell injury and death, inflammatory cell activation and aggregation, interstitial fibroblast proliferation, and extracellular matrix deposition [6, 7].

Necroptosis has recently been implicated as one of the most important pathways of renal tubular epithelial cell death in response to inflammatory stimuli [8]. Unlike highly coordinated and immunologically inert apoptosis, necroptosis is regarded as a passive and highly inflammatory form of cell death that results in the release of alarmins and other pro-inflammatory signals into the cellular surroundings [9]. Caspase8 is a crucial mediator of apoptosis and necroptosis [10]. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), which activates downstream mixed-lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL), is a critical regulatory pathway protein in necroptosis. RIPK3, as a sensor of environmental and cellular stress, is regulated by RIPK1 to initiate and deliver necrosis signals to MLKL and phosphoglycerate mutase 5 (PGAM5) [11, 12]. PGAM5 is a serine/threonine protein phosphatase located in the outer mitochondrial membrane that binds to the necrosome vesicles formed by RIPK3–MLKL in the mitochondria and regulates mitochondrial division by promoting dephosphorylation of dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), causing an imbalance in mitochondrial quality-control homeostasis [13]. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) induce cellular necrosis [14]. In tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced cell necrosis, mtROS-driven autophosphorylation of RIPK1 is essential for the recruitment of RIPK3 to necrotic vesicles to cause necrosis [15]. Furthermore, the TNF-induced release of mtDNA into the cytoplasm activates DNA sensors, enhances RIPK3–MLKL-dependent necrosis, and promotes increased mitochondrial membrane permeability [16, 17].

We previously transplanted human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HucMSCs) into models of unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO) and aristolochic acid-induced renal fibrosis and renal tubular epithelial cell injury. The results showed that HucMSCs can effectively alleviate renal injury in model mice and significantly promote the repair of tubular epithelial cells [18,19,20]. However, allogeneic MSCs still have many limitations in clinical application due to potential immune rejection, tumor formation risk, and other aspects [21, 22]. As a recently discovered carrier of intercellular regulation, exosomes are the primary effector mode of the stem cell paracrine effect [23, 24]. Exosomes play an important role in the protection and repair of various tissue damages and can avoid the risks associated with stem cell therapy. With more apparent advantages, exosomes have become one of the most potent tools for the repair of tissue and organ damage. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are currently considered the most diverse inclusions in exosomes. Experimentally, we discovered that miR-874-3p may be the principal miRNA regulating the repair of renal tubular epithelial cell injury in HucMSC-Exo. In this paper, we explored its relevance to necroptosis.

The present study was grounded on the hypothesis that HucMSC-derived exosomes (HucMSC-Exos) can regulate the occurrence of necroptosis through the delivery of miRNAs in the injured kidney, which is mainly regulated through miR-874-3p. Under the stimulation by pathological factors, the necroptosis pathway of renal tubular epithelial cells is activated as a key initiating factor that promotes kidney fibrosis. We assessed whether HucMSC-Exos inhibit RIPK1 through miR-874-3p to regulate the necroptosis pathway, maintain mitochondrial homeostasis, protect renal tubular epithelial cells, block the process of renal fibrosis, and promote renal injury repair.

Materials and methods

Experimental animals

Adult male specific-pathogen-free C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks old, 20–25 g) were purchased from Chongqing Medical University [license no. SYXK (Chongqing) 2007-0001]. The mice were raised in Chongqing Medical University Children’s Hospital Experimental Animal Center [license no. SYXK (Chongqing) 2007-0016]. The mice were housed in polycarbonate cages with a 12-h light/dark cycle at constant room temperature (24 °C) and controlled relative humidity (40–80%). All experimental procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the Basel Declaration and were approved by the ethics committee of Chongqing Medical University (no. CHCMU-IACUC20211222002).

Isolation and identification of HucMSC-Exos

HucMSCs (cat.no. PCS-500-010) were provided by Chongqing Stem Cell Biotechnology R&D Base, Chongqing, China. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Corning, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The HucMSCs of`passage 1 to passage 6 are routinely cultured; when the cells reached around 80% confluence, the medium was replaced with an exosome-free serum medium, and the supernatant was collected after 48 h. The collected cell supernatant was centrifuged at low speed at 1000g for 10 min, then 2000g for 20 min, and finally at 10,000g for 30 min to remove cells and cell debris. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter and centrifuged at 100,000g for 70 min. The upper layer was discarded, and the lower layer was resuspended and concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 100,000g for 70 min. Finally, the exosomes were resuspended in PBS. A BCA kit was used to determine protein concentration in exosome preparations, and western blotting was used to assess exosome markers CD63, Alix, and Tsg101. One microliter of exosome suspension was taken, diluted 5000 times with PBS, resuspended, and mixed thoroughly. Then 20 μl of the diluted suspension was added dropwise to a copper mesh grid for an electron microscope, and it was let dry at room temperature overnight, fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde, and scanning electron microscopy was used to observe exosome morphology. The number and size of exosomes was directly tracked by the rate of Brownian motion of exosomes using ZetaView (Particle Metrix GmbH, Ammersee, Germany). The exosome suspension was diluted ten times with PBS and transferred to a cuvette; after 60 s of Brownian motion, the nanoparticle size and concentration distribution were determined. Besides, 2.5 μl of PKH26 was added to 200 μl exosome suspension and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min, then added the medium and centrifuged at 100,000g for 70 min, after which exosomes labeled with PKH26 could be obtained.

Animals and groups

A mouse UUO model was established as previously described [19]. Twenty-four mice were randomly divided into four groups: sham, Exo, UUO, and UUO + Exo. Exos (100 µg) were injected through the tail vein 1 and 3 days after surgery. The kidneys were removed on day 7 after surgery; some were placed in paraformaldehyde, and some were placed at –80 °C for subsequent experiments.

Cell culture and groups

HK-2 cells (cat. no. CRL-2190) purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection were cultured under the same conditions as used for HucMSCs. HK-2 cells grown to approximately 80–90% confluence were induced with cisplatin (5 μg/ml) in the absence or presence of HucMSC-Exo (100 μg/ml) with 24 h. Samples were collected after modeling for analyses.

Histological observations

Kidney specimens were fixed in paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned to 4 μm thickness. After dewaxing and treatment with gradient alcohol, the slides were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE), periodic acid–Schiff (PAS), and Masson’s trichrome.

Immunofluorescent staining

HK-2 cells were seeded in confocal culture dishes and incubated under the conditions described above. The cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min each time, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 min, exposed to 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Solarbio, China) for 1 h, and then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The following day, the excess primary antibody was removed by washing three times with PBS, and the corresponding secondary antibody was added. Hoechst was used to stain nuclei of cells. Kidney tissue sections were dewaxed in water and placed in a citrate buffer solution for microwave heating to retrieve antigens. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% H2O2 for 15 min, after which the slides were washed three times with PBS. Following blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h, the sections were incubated with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. The subsequent fluorescence steps were the same as in the cell experiment. The images were obtained by a confocal microscope (Nikon, Japan) and were analyzed and processed by the Nis Viewer software.

Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemistry, tissue sections were dewaxed in water and placed in citrate buffer solution for microwave heating to retrieve antigen. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% H2O2 for 15 min, after which the slides were washed three times with PBS. Following blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h, the sections were incubated with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. The corresponding secondary antibody (1:200 dilution; Zhongshan, China) was incubated for 1 h. Positive staining was achieved by incubation with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Zhongshan, China), and the sections were subsequently counterstained with hematoxylin. The images were examined by optical microscopy (Olympus, Japan).

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from kidney tissues and HK-2 cells. The isolated RNA was reverse-transcribed using a miRcute Plus miRNA First-Strand cDNA Kit (Tiangen, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the samples were first added to lysate 1 (100 μl) and lysate 2 (600 μl), placed on the purification column, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 s, then added the washing solution and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 s, three times; finally, DEPC water was added and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 s to obtain the total RNA. The quantity of miRNA was measured using SYBR Green I (Tiangen, China) and a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA). The relative expression levels of miR-874-3p were calculated by the comparative cycle threshold method using the expression of U6 small nuclear RNA as a reference for miRNA (sequence-specific primers are shown in Additional file 2: Table S1, S2). The 2−ΔΔCt method was used for the analysis. The sequence-specific primers used for miR-874-3p and U6 are shown in Additional file 2.

Western blot

HK-2 cells and kidney tissues were placed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Technology, China) with 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to extract proteins. A BCA assay kit was used to measure the protein concentration. The proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, USA). After blocking with blot blocking buffer (NCM, China) for 1 h, the membranes were incubated with various primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight (antibodies are shown in Additional file 2: Table S3), followed by three rinses with Tris-buffered saline/Tween, and incubated at a 1:5000 dilution of goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Zenbio, China) for 1 h. Membranes were examined using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Bio-Rad).

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) detection

ROS production in HK-2 cells was detected using a ROS assay kit (Beyotime Technology). Briefly, live-HK-2 cells were incubated with 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate at 37 °C for 20 min, washed with serum-free medium three times, and observed by fluorescence microscopy. Production of mtROS in HK-2 cells was detected using MitoSOX Red Mitochondrial Superoxide Indicator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Briefly, the MitoSOX reagent was added to Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) to a concentration of 5 μM. The probe solution was loaded into viable HK-2 cells and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, followed by three washes with HBSS, incubation for 10 min at 37 °C with Hoechst, washing three times with HBSS, and photography of fluorescence microscopy images.

miRNA mimics/inhibitor transfection and dual-luciferase reporter assay

miR-874-3p mimics, miR-874-3p inhibitor, and corresponding negative controls were obtained from RiboBio Company (China). HK-2 cells were seeded in six-well plates and transfected with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The construction of recombinant plasmids in the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the RIPK1 gene, wild type (h-RIPK1-WT), and mutant (h-RIPK1-MUT) was performed by the RiboBio Company. Co-transfection of recombinant plasmids and miR-874-3p mimics and miR-874-3p NC mimics was performed in HK-2 cells. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured 48 h after co-transfection using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, USA).

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) analysis

Co-IP was performed using a Co-IP assay kit (Absin, China). Protein lysates from HK-2 cells were incubated with a PGAM5 antibody overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were bound to protein A/G agarose beads. The complexes were centrifuged and resuspended in SDS, and western blotting was used to detect protein expression. Normal IgG was used as a negative control.

Statistical analyses

Experimental data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparison, followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test. All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, USA), and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Identification and labeling of HucMSC-Exos

To determine whether exosome extraction was successful, we observed preparations by electron microscopy. Round or oval exosome vesicles with diameters ranging from 30 to 150 nm and a bilayer membrane structure were evident. Nanoparticle size analysis revealed that the particles were mainly enriched at 128.7 nm (Fig. 1A and C). Western blotting detected the CD63, Alix, and Tsg101 exosome markers (Fig. 1B). These findings demonstrated the successful extraction of exosomes from the HucMSC supernatant. We examined the uptake of PKH-26-labeled exosomes by HK-2 cells in vitro. Fluorescence microscopy revealed the uptake of exosomes by HK-2 cells after 6 and 12 h (Fig. 1D). The findings supported the use of a 6-h pretreatment time in subsequent in vitro experiments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Identification and labeling of HucMSC-Exo. A Morphology of HucMSC-Exo detected by electron microscopy. B Western blot detection of exosome-related markers in HucMSC-Exo and MSC. C HucMSC-Exo nanoparticle size analysis detected by Particle Metrix’ ZetaView; particles were mainly enriched at 128.7 nm. D HK-2 cell uptake of HucMSC-Exo labeled by PKH-26

Full size image

HucMSC-Exos improve renal pathological structure and fibrosis in UUO

To observe the morphological changes in the kidneys of mice treated with UUO and HucMSC-Exos, kidney sections were examined with HE and PAS staining (Fig. 2A). The morphology of the kidneys in the Sham and Exo groups was intact with no significant abnormalities. However, in the UUO group, renal tubular dilatation or atrophy with loss of brush border and massive inflammatory cell infiltration with disorganization of the interstitial region were observed. Furthermore, the number of sites and severity of renal structural damage was significantly less than that in the UUO group after intervention with HucMSC-Exos. Masson’s trichrome staining revealed the deposition of many collagen fibers in the interstitial region of the UUO group (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the area of fiber deposition was significantly reduced in the UUO + Exo group compared with that in the UUO group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Examination of kidney morphology and fibrosis markers in four groups in vivo. A HE, PAS, and Masson staining in each group. B Immunohistochemistry of fibrosis-related markers (Collagen I, Vimentin, and α-SMA) in each group. C Western blot of fibrosis-related markers (Collagen I, Vimentin, and α-SMA) and Kim1 in each group. D–G Relative expression of fibrosis-related markers and Kim1 detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with sham group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with UUO group

Full size image

In addition, we examined the expression of fibrosis-related markers, vimentin, fibronectin, and collagen I, and the tubular epithelial injury marker, kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim1), in various groups in vivo. Western blotting revealed that the expression of all of these indicators was significantly increased after UUO, and exosome intervention (Fig. 2C) effectively suppressed the expression of these factors. The immunohistochemistry results were consistent with the western blotting results (Fig. 2B). These findings demonstrate that HucMSC-Exo intervention can effectively alleviate the progression of renal fibrosis and tubular epithelial cell injury in vivo and promote kidney repair after injury.

HucMSC-Exos inhibit necroptosis pathway in vivo

The expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, and p-MLKL proteins related to the necroptosis pathway were significantly increased in exosome-injected UUO-modeled mice (Fig. 3A), suggesting that the necroptosis pathway was activated, and necroptosis pathway-related proteins were inhibited after exosome intervention. The results obtained by western blotting and immunohistochemistry were consistent (Fig. 3B–G). Previous research has shown a critical regulatory role of PGAM5 in cell death mediated by necroptosis [25]. We further detected PGAM5 expression in vivo. The expression trend of PGAM5 was the same as that of necroptosis-related proteins. The experimental results demonstrated that the necroptosis pathway was activated when kidney cells were damaged, further promoting the expression of PGAM5.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Examination of necroptosis-related markers in four groups in vivo. A Immunohistochemistry detected of necroptosis-related markers (RIPK1, RIPK3, and p-MLKL) in each group. B Western blot of necroptosis-related markers (RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL, p-MLKL, and PGAM5) in each group. C–G Relative expression of necroptosis-related markers detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with sham group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with UUO group

Full size image

HucMSC-Exos promote mitochondrial fusion in vivo

Double immunofluorescence staining revealed that distinct mitochondrial membrane structures (translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane complex subunit 20, Tomm20) were visible in renal tubules in the sham group (Fig. 4A). In contrast, in the UUO group, mitochondrial membrane structures were not visible in renal tubules with deposition of necroptosis markers (phosphorylated MLKL and p-MLKL), suggesting disruption of the mitochondrial structure. We hypothesized that there is interactive regulation of necroptosis and mitochondrial quality control. Therefore, we next examined the expression of the mitochondrial kinetic protein Drp1 in vivo. Increased Drp1 dephosphorylation was evident in the UUO group, and decreased phosphorylated Drp1 expression further caused mitochondrial quality control disorder. Therefore, we examined the expression of mitochondrial fusion proteins mitofusin (Mfn)1 and Mfn2 (Fig. 4B and F); their expression was reduced in the UUO group. This trend was reversed by the addition of exosomes. These results demonstrate that the intervention of HucMSC-Exos can effectively inhibit the promotion of mitochondrial fission in UUO-modeled injury.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Examination of mitochondrially related markers in four groups in vivo. A Immunofluorescence of Tomm20 and p-MLKL in the kidney sections in four groups. B Western blot of mitochondrial fusion-related markers (Drp1, p-Drp1, Mfn1, and Mfn2) in each group. C–E Relative expression of mitochondrial fusion-related markers detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with sham group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with UUO group. F Immunohistochemistry of Mfn2 in each group

Full size image

HucMSC-Exos inhibit the necroptosis pathway and ROS production in vitro

In vitro, we added exosomes to the culture medium 6 h before pretreatment, followed by the addition of cisplatin to induce renal tubular epithelial cell injury. The results showed that cisplatin-induced necroptosis pathway protein expression was significantly increased in HK-2 cells, whereas it significantly decreased in HK-2 cells pretreated with exosomes compared with the cisplatin group (Fig. 5B and G, Additional file 1: Fig. S2A–D).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Examination of ROS level and necroptosis-related markers in four groups in vitro. A Immunofluorescence detected with the ROS indicator DCFH (green) and the mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) indicator MitoSox (red) in each group. B Western blot of necroptosis-related markers (RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL, p-MLKL, and PGAM5) in each group. C–F Relative expression of necroptosis-related markers detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with cisplatin (Cis) group. G Immunohistochemistry of necroptosis-related markers in each group

Full size image

In addition, we examined the expression of ROS and mtROS in different groups of HK-2 cells (Fig. 5A). The expression of ROS and mtROS was significantly increased in the cisplatin-induced HK-2 injury model. Simultaneously, ROS production appeared to be decreased considerably after exosome intervention. ROS production was directly correlated with necroptosis, and mtROS, a byproduct of mitochondrial respiration, was significantly increased by cisplatin injury in HK-2 cells, after which mtROS expression was significantly reduced.

HucMSC-Exos promote mitochondrial fusion by inhibiting PGAM5 dephosphorylation of Drp1 in vitro

Next, we examined the expression of mitochondrial dynamin protein Drp1 in vitro. Exosomes effectively inhibited cisplatin-induced dephosphorylation of Drp1. Significant increases in the expression of mitochondrial fusion proteins Mfn1 and Mfn2 were observed after exosome intervention compared with that in the cisplatin group (Fig. 6A and E). In addition, we detected endogenous interactions between PGAM5 and Drp1 in HK-2 cells using Co-IP assays (Fig. 6F). The collective data indicate that PGAM5 acts as an upstream mediator of Drp1S637 dephosphorylation to promote cisplatin mitochondrial fission. The findings also demonstrated in both in vivo and in vitro examination that HucMSC-Exos can inhibit the activation of necroptosis and abnormalities in mitochondrial fission.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Examination of mitochondrially related markers in four groups in vitro. A Western blot of mitochondrial fusion-related markers (Drp1, p-Drp1, Mfn1, and Mfn2) in each group. B–D Relative expression of mitochondrial fusion-related markers detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with cisplatin (Cis) group. E Immunohistochemistry of Mfn2 in each group. F Co-immunoprecipitation assays detecting Drp1 and PGAM5 interaction in HK-2 cells

Full size image

HucMSC-Exo-derived miR-874-3p targeting of RIPK1 inhibits necroptosis

The preceding experiments demonstrated that exosomes could further influence mitochondrial quality control by regulating the necroptosis pathway, thereby promoting mitochondrial homeostasis and damage repair in renal tubular epithelial cells. Next, we screened HucMSC-Exos as a possible key effector of miR-874-3p by comprehensive analysis of miRNA sequencing of renal tissue in the sham-operated and UUO groups (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). The analysis indicated the targeting of RIPK1, a critical molecule of necroptosis (Additional file 1: Fig. S1B and C). Furthermore, miR-874-3p could target and regulate the expression of RIPK1. We examined the expression of miR-874-3p in various groups in vivo and found that its expression was the lowest in the UUO group, while there was an increase in its expression after exosome intervention (Fig. 7A).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Detection of miR-874-3p expression and its targeting to necroptosis. A Quantitative PCR detects the expression of miR-874-3p in each group in vivo. **p < 0.01, compared with sham group; ##p < 0.01, compared with UUO group. B Detection of miR-874-3p targeting RIPK1 by dual-luciferase reporter gene assay. **p < 0.01, compared with WT + NC group. C Western blot of necroptosis-related markers (RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL, p-MLKL, and PGAM5) in each group. D–G Relative expression of necroptosis-related markers detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with cisplatin (Cis) group. H Western blot of Mfn1 and Mfn2 in each group. I, J Relative expression of Mfn1 and Mfn2 detected by western blot. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared with Cis group

Full size image

We successfully transfected miR-874-3p into HK-2 cells in vitro and demonstrated that miR-874-3p could target RIPK1 using a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay (Fig. 7B and Additional file 1: Fig. S1D). In addition, we transfected mimics/NC with miR-874-3p in HK-2 cells and added cisplatin to investigate whether miR-874-3p regulates the development of necroptosis (Fig. 7C). Cisplatin-induced necroptosis was significantly inhibited by the addition of miR-874-3p mimics, while there was no significant difference between the NC and cisplatin addition groups. Further detection of mitochondrial fusion proteins (Fig. 7H) and the expression of Mfn1 and Mfn2 revealed inhibition in the mimics NC and cisplatin addition groups and significantly increased expression in the Cis + mimic group.

Discussion

In this study, we identified the role of HucMSC-Exos in promoting the repair of renal tubular epithelial cell injury. Our results suggest five points: First, tubular epithelial cells undergo oxidative stress and necroptosis after kidney injury and play a critical regulatory role. Second, PGAM5 can further aggravate tubular epithelial cell injury after necroptosis by dephosphorylating the S637 site of Drp1, thereby unbalancing mitochondrial quality-control homeostasis, promoting mitochondrial division, and reducing mitochondrial fusion. Third, intervention using HucMSC-Exos can effectively reduce the extent of renal tubular epithelial cell injury and promote post-injury repair. Fourth, HucMSC-Exos can promote renal tubular epithelial cell repair by inhibiting necroptosis and restoring mitochondrial homeostasis. Finally, HucMSC-Exo-derived miRNA may target RIPK1, with miR-874-3p having a role in regulating programmed necrosis and mitochondrial division. Mechanistically, intervention using HucMSC-Exos can attenuate oxidative stress after renal tubular epithelial cell injury, reduce the activation of the necroptosis pathway, promote homeostasis of mitochondrial quality control, and successfully promote repair of tubular epithelial cell injury.

Apoptosis may be important in the progression of AKI. Inhibiting apoptosis can effectively block the progression of AKI and promote renal repair [26]. Nevertheless, recent studies have found that inhibitors of caspases failed to protect renal function in mice with ischemia–reperfusion injury. Additionally, deleting apoptosis-related proteins in the renal tubules, such as caspase8 and Fas-associated protein with death domain, did not protect against AKI [27, 28]. On the basis of the above studies, many researchers believe that apoptosis is not crucial for AKI [29]. Other forms of cell death occur during kidney injury. Necroptosis is a regulated, pro-inflammatory, and caspase-independent form of necrotic cell death [30]. TNF receptor engagement leads to the activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, leading to the formation of the necrosome. RIPK3 phosphorylates MLKL, leading to necroptosis activation. Active oligomerized MLKL mediates plasma membrane rupture, killing the cell [13, 31, 32]. Aberrant levels of necroptosis have been implicated in various inflammatory diseases and ischemic injuries, making this cell death mechanism an important therapeutic target [33]. Necroptosis has an essential regulatory role in AKI and renal transplantation [34,35,36,37]. Activation of mtROS in some cells enables autophosphorylation of RIPK1, leading to the activation of necroptosis pathways and the formation of the necrosome [15, 38]. RIPK3 activates the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in a feed-forward manner, contributing to enhanced aerobic respiration and mtROS generation [39]. Increased levels of ROS can promote the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and affect mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to an increased likelihood of cell necrosis [40, 41]. Mitochondrial homeostatic imbalance and necroptosis form a feedback loop that further aggravates cellular damage. Therefore, we focused on necroptosis in kidney cell injury.

HucMSCs could be an ideal therapeutic approach because of their beneficial properties, including easy extraction and expansion, low cost, noninvasive collection procedures, significant cell content, low risk of infection, high proliferation factors, and low immunogenicity [42, 43]. Therefore, we selected HucMSCs as the seed cells of exosome origin. Compared with their parent cells, MSC-Exos have a better safety profile and can be stored without losing function [44]. They have been considered in recent years as ideal vesicles for future biologic therapies and have demonstrated their role and potential in the repair of damage in a variety of organ systems [23, 45,46,47]. Exosomes are EVs with a size range of 40–160 nm (average ~ 100 nm) in diameter and exert their regulatory effects mainly through their inclusions, such as proteins, miRNAs, and long noncoding RNAs [48,49,50]. Of these, miRNAs are currently considered the most diverse. miR-874-3p reportedly inhibits tumor growth or metastasis by regulating signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, cyclin-dependent kinase 9, and E2F transcription factor 3; reduces brain ischemia by regulating BCL-2-modifying factor in reperfusion injury; and reduces apoptosis and inflammation in alveolar epithelial cells by targeting early growth response 3/nuclear factor-kappa B [51,52,53]. According to previous experiments, miR-874-3p inhibits tumor metastasis and apoptosis to promote tissue environment repair and homeostasis. In the present study, the correlation between miR-874-3p and necroptosis was discovered for the first time. miR-874-3p regulated necroptosis and mitochondrial fission in renal tubular epithelial cells by targeting RIPK1 to promote injury repair in the kidney.

Exosomes derived from MSCs are very promising for the treatment of various diseases. Yet, the clinical application of MSC-Exos remains challenging. The number of exosomes needed in humans is many times larger than that required in mice, and the low yield of exosomes is a major challenge that significantly impedes the relevant industrial and clinical translation [54]. Second, exosomes currently have multiple other extraction approaches, and different methods may have slight differences. Ensuring the stability of the inclusions during their extraction and their therapeutic effects on diseases remain to be explored [55].

Conclusion

The collective findings of the present study demonstrate that HucMSC-Exos can regulate necroptosis through miR-874-3p to attenuate renal tubular epithelial cell injury and enhance repair. This study provides new therapeutic modalities and ideas for the treatment of AKI and the process of AKI to CKD transformation to mitigate renal damage.

Availability of data and materials

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

HucMSC-Exo:

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell exosome

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

ESRD:

End-stage renal disease

RIPK:

Receptor-interacting protein kinase

MLKL:

Mixed-lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase

PGAM5:

Phosphoglycerate mutase 5

Drp1:

Dynamin-related protein 1

mtROS:

Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

UUO:

Unilateral ureter obstruction

miRNA:

MicroRNA

HE:

Hematoxylin–eosin

PAS:

Periodic acid–Schiff

HBSS:

Hank’s balanced salt solution

UTR:

Untranslated region

Co-IP:

Co-immunoprecipitation

Kim 1:

Kidney injury molecule 1

α-SMA:

Alpha-smooth muscle actin

Mfn:

Mitochondrial fusion

NC:

Negative control

References

  1. Hoste EJ, Kellum JA, Selby NM, Zarbock A, Palevsky PM, Bagshaw SM, et al. Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(10):607–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30045-3

  3. François H, Chatziantoniou C. Renal fibrosis: recent translational aspects. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:318–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2017.12.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32064-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Romagnani P, Remuzzi G, Glassock R, Levin A, Jager KJ, Tonelli M, et al. Chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17088. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boor P, Ostendorf T, Floege J. Renal fibrosis: novel insights into mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6(11):643–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2010.120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Campanholle G, Ligresti G, Gharib SA, Duffield JS. Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 3. Novel mechanisms of kidney fibrosis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013;304(7):C591-603. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00414.2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi Y, Chen X, Huang C, Pollock C. RIPK3: a new player in renal fibrosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertheloot D, Latz E, Franklin BS. Necroptosis, pyroptosis and apoptosis: an intricate game of cell death. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(5):1106–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-00630-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Du F, Wang X. TNF-alpha induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways. Cell. 2008;133(4):693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Park J, Ha HJ, Chung ES, Baek SH, Cho Y, Kim HK, et al. O-GlcNAcylation ameliorates the pathological manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease by inhibiting necroptosis. Sci Adv. 2021;7(3):eabd3207. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd3207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank D, Vince JE. Pyroptosis versus necroptosis: similarities, differences, and crosstalk. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26(1):99–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-018-0212-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng M, Lin N, Dong D, Ma J, Su J, Sun L. PGAM5: a crucial role in mitochondrial dynamics and programmed cell death. Eur J Cell Biol. 2021;100(1):151144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2020.151144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang C, Cai J, Yin XM, Weinberg JM, Venkatachalam MA, Dong Z. Mitochondrial quality control in kidney injury and repair. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(5):299–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00369-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Su SS, Zhao S, Yang Z, Zhong CQ, Chen X, et al. RIP1 autophosphorylation is promoted by mitochondrial ROS and is essential for RIP3 recruitment into necrosome. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14329. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Whelan RS, Konstantinidis K, Wei AC, Chen Y, Reyna DE, Jha S, et al. Bax regulates primary necrosis through mitochondrial dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(17):6566–71. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201608109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen D, Tong J, Yang L, Wei L, Stolz DB, Yu J, et al. PUMA amplifies necroptosis signaling by activating cytosolic DNA sensors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(15):3930–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717190115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu Y, Hu D, Zhou Y, Xiang H, Liu B, Shen L, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell attenuates renal fibrosis via TGF-β/Smad signaling pathways in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;883:173343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu B, Ding F, Hu D, Zhou Y, Long C, Shen L, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium attenuates renal fibrosis by reducing inflammation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0760-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu D, Zhang D, Liu B, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Yu Y, et al. Human ucMSCs seeded in a decellularized kidney scaffold attenuate renal fibrosis by reducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition via the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Pediatr Res. 2020;88(2):192–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0736-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karnoub AE, Dash AB, Vo AP, Sullivan A, Brooks MW, Bell GW, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2007;449(7162):557–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohi Y, Qin H, Hong C, Blouin L, Polo JM, Guo T, et al. Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(5):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheller-Miller S, Radnaa E, Yoo J-K, Kim E, Choi K, Kim Y, et al. Exosomal delivery of NF-κB inhibitor delays LPS-induced preterm birth and modulates fetal immune cell profile in mouse models. Sci Adv. 2021;7(4):eabd3865. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd3865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Keshtkar S, Azarpira N, Ghahremani MH. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: novel frontiers in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu H, Tan Y, Du W, Li Y, Toan S, Mui D, et al. Phosphoglycerate mutase 5 exacerbates cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury through disrupting mitochondrial quality control. Redox Biol. 2021;38:101777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101777.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Daemen MA, Van’T Veer C, Denecker G, Heemskerk VH, Wolfs TG, Clauss M, et al. Inhibition of apoptosis induced by ischemia-reperfusion prevents inflammation. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(5):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci6974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Linkermann A, Bräsen JH, Himmerkus N, Liu S, Huber TB, Kunzendorf U, et al. Rip1 (receptor-interacting protein kinase 1) mediates necroptosis and contributes to renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2012;81(8):751–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Linkermann A, Skouta R, Himmerkus N, Mulay SR, Dewitz C, De Zen F, et al. Synchronized renal tubular cell death involves ferroptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(47):16836–41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415518111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maremonti F, Meyer C, Linkermann A. Mechanisms and models of kidney tubular necrosis and nephron loss. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(3):472–86. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2021101293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinlich R, Oberst A, Beere HM, Green DR. Necroptosis in development, inflammation and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(2):127–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao J, Jitkaew S, Cai Z, Choksi S, Li Q, Luo J, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like is a key receptor interacting protein 3 downstream component of TNF-induced necrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(14):5322–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200012109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun L, Wang H, Wang Z, He S, Chen S, Liao D, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. 2012;148(1–2):213–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bock FJ, Tait SWG. Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(2):85–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0173-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang B, Lan S, Dieudé M, Sabo-Vatasescu JP, Karakeussian-Rimbaud A, Turgeon J, et al. Caspase-3 is a pivotal regulator of microvascular rarefaction and renal fibrosis after ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(7):1900–16. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2017050581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lau A, Wang S, Jiang J, Haig A, Pavlosky A, Linkermann A, et al. RIPK3-mediated necroptosis promotes donor kidney inflammatory injury and reduces allograft survival. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(11):2805–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Linkermann A, Bräsen JH, Darding M, Jin MK, Sanz AB, Heller JO, et al. Two independent pathways of regulated necrosis mediate ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(29):12024–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305538110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Linkermann A, De Zen F, Weinberg J, Kunzendorf U, Krautwald S. Programmed necrosis in acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(9):3412–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schenk B, Fulda S. Reactive oxygen species regulate Smac mimetic/TNFα-induced necroptotic signaling and cell death. Oncogene. 2015;34(47):5796–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, He X, Zhong CQ, Ni H, et al. RIP3 targets pyruvate dehydrogenase complex to increase aerobic respiration in TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(2):186–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0022-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Halestrap AP, Clarke SJ, Javadov SA. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening during myocardial reperfusion–a target for cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61(3):372–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00533-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Assaly R, De Tassigny A, Paradis S, Jacquin S, Berdeaux A, Morin D. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and cell death during hypoxia-reoxygenation in adult cardiomyocytes. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;675(1–3):6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.11.036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ding DC, Chang YH, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells: a new era for stem cell therapy. Cell Transplant. 2015;24(3):339–47. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368915x686841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shi Y, Yang Y, Guo Q, Gao Q, Ding Y, Wang H, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promote fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation in inflammatory environments and benefit cardioprotective effects. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28(12):799–811. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2018.0242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fujita Y, Kadota T, Araya J, Ochiya T, Kuwano K. Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics for inflammatory lung diseases. J Clin Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gan J, Sun L, Chen G, Ma W, Zhao Y, Sun L. Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes encapsulated oral microcapsules for acute colitis treatment. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202201105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li X, Liu L, Yang J, Yu Y, Chai J, Wang L, et al. Exosome derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell mediates MiR-181c attenuating burn-induced excessive inflammation. EBioMedicine. 2016;8:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Song Y, Wang B, Zhu X, Hu J, Sun J, Xuan J, et al. Human umbilical cord blood–derived MSCs exosome attenuate myocardial injury by inhibiting ferroptosis in acute myocardial infarction mice. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2021;37(1):51–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-020-09530-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gao D, Jiang L. Exosomes in cancer therapy: a novel experimental strategy. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8(11):2165–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kalluri R, Lebleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gharavi AT, Hanjani NA, Movahed E, Doroudian M. The role of macrophage subtypes and exosomes in immunomodulation. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2022;27(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-022-00384-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu WG, Zhuo L, Lu Y, Wang L, Ji YX, Guo Q. miR-874–3p inhibits cell migration through targeting RGS4 in osteosarcoma. J Gene Med. 2020;22(9):e3213. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang Y, Yan C, Qi J, Liu C, Yu J, Wang H. miR-874-3p mitigates cisplatin resistance through modulating NF-κB/inhibitor of apoptosis protein signaling pathway in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2022;477(1):307–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-021-04271-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yuan RB, Zhang SH, He Y, Zhang XY, Zhang YB. MiR-874–3p is an independent prognostic factor and functions as an anti-oncomir in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via targeting STAT3. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(21):7265–73. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201811_16261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ingato D, Lee JU, Sim SJ, Kwon YJ. Good things come in small packages: overcoming challenges to harness extracellular vesicles for therapeutic delivery. J Control Release. 2016;241:174–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.09.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Shao H, Im H, Castro CM, Breakefield X, Weissleder R, Lee H. New technologies for analysis of extracellular vesicles. Chem Rev. 2018;118(4):1917–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the authors listed in this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Project of Yuzhong District of Chongqing (20200126), the General Basic Research Project from the Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders (GBRP-202109), Chongqing Science and Health Joint TCM Technology Innovation and Application Development Project (2020ZY023877), Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine, Chongqing Medical University (W0056).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China

    Yihang Yu, Meiling Chen, Qitong Guo, Lianju Shen, Xing Liu, Deying Zhang & Guanghui Wei

  2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Department and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China

    Yihang Yu, Meiling Chen, Qitong Guo, Lianju Shen, Xing Liu, Deying Zhang & Guanghui Wei

  3. National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, 400014, China

    Yihang Yu, Meiling Chen, Qitong Guo, Lianju Shen, Xing Liu, Deying Zhang & Guanghui Wei

  4. Center for Novel Target and Therapeutic Intervention, Institute of Life Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Jianbo Pan

  5. Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA

    Yuanyuan Zhang

  6. Biomanufacturing Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Tao Xu

Authors
  1. Yihang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meiling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qitong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lianju Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jianbo Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuanyuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Deying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Guanghui Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.Y. performed most of the experiments and wrote the manuscript. M.C. and Q.G. contributed to the experiments. L.S. and X.L. analyzed the data. J.P. contributed to the discussion. Y.Z. and T.X. reviewed the manuscript. D.Z. and G.W. designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deying Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the Basel Declaration and were approved by the ethics committee of Chongqing Medical University (approval no. CHCMU-IACUC20211222002, approval date 22 December 2021).

Consent for publication

This manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Figures.

Additional file 2.

Supplementary Tables (Primers and antibodies informations).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Chen, M., Guo, Q. et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell exosome-derived miR-874-3p targeting RIPK1/PGAM5 attenuates kidney tubular epithelial cell damage. Cell Mol Biol Lett 28, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-023-00425-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-023-00425-0

Keywords

Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

ISSN: 1689-1392

Contact us